Skip to content

Trial to compare the efficacy and safety of tretinoin clindamycin phosphate gel to clindamycin phosphate gel alone, tretinoin gel alone, and vehicle in the treatment of acne vulgaris in patients from 12 to less than 18 years of age.

Multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, active- and vehicle-controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of tretinoin clindamycin phosphate gel to clindamycin phosphate gel alone, tretinoin gel alone, and vehicle in the treatment of acne vulgaris in patients from 12 to less than 18 years of age.

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2010-022918-15-Outside-EU/EEA
Enrollment
1288
Registered
2012-03-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Treatment of acne vulgaris MedDRA version: 14.1 Level: HLT Classification code 10000497 Term: Acnes System Organ Class: 10040785 - Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders

Interventions

Product Name: ClinRa Gel Pharmaceutical Form: Gel INN or Proposed INN: CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE CAS Number: 24729-96-2 Concentration unit: % (W/W) percent weight/weight Concentration type: equal Concentr

Sponsors

Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Male or female subjects of any race • 12 years of age or older • acne vulgaris • 20-50 inflammatory lesions (papules and pustules) • 20-100 non-inflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) • = 2 nodules. Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: 795 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 493 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Any dermatological conditions on the face that could interfere with clinical evaluations such as acne conglobata, acne fulminans, secondary acne, etc; • Any underlying disease(s) or some other dermatological condition of the face that requires the use of interfering topical or systemic therapy; • Female subjects who are pregnant, nursing mothers, planning a pregnancy during the course of the trial, or become pregnant during the study; • History of regional enteritis, ulcerative colitis or antibiotic-associated colitis; • Treatment of any type for cancer within the last 6 months; • History of hypersensitivity or allergic reactions to any of the study preparations as described in the Investigator’s Brochure, including known sensitivities to any dosage form of clindamycin, lincomycin or tretinoin; • Recent history or concurrent use of certain topical or systemic medication.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary Objective: ---;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: see above;Main Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of Clin-RA Gel to Clindamycin phosphate 1.2% Gel alone, Tretinoin 0.025% Gel alone, and Clin-RA Gel vehicle in the treatment of acne vulgaris.;Primary end point(s): Co-primary efficacy variables: 1. Percent change from baseline to Week 12 in inflammatory lesion counts; 2. Percent change from baseline to Week 12 in non-inflammatory lesion counts; 3. Percent change from baseline to Week 12 in total lesion counts; 4. Dichotomised Global Severity Score: Percentage of subjects who had the Evaluator’s Gobal Severity Score of clear or almost clear at Week 12.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): 1. Efficacy - Modified Dichotomised Global Severity Score: Percentage of subjects who were clear or almost clear at Week 12 or achieved at least 2 grades of improvement in the Evaluator's Global Severity Score from Baseline to Week 12; 2. Efficacy - Percentage of subjects with a Baseline Evaluator's Global Severity Score of at least severe (=4 or 5) who achieved at least a 2-grade improvement in the Evaluator's Global Severity Score from Baseline to Week 12; 3. Safety - Safety measurements, including cutaneous safety and tolerability evaluations and adverse event (AE) monitoring, were conducted at each visit (Week 2, 4, 8 and 12). ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: see above

Countries

United States

Contacts

Public ContactDepartment Clinical Development

MEDA Pharma GmbH & Co. KG

joachim.maus@medapharma.de00496172888 1265

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026