Skip to content

Gadovit-Studie Intraindividueller Vergleich der diagnostischen Wertigkeit von delayed-enhancement imaging mit Gadobutrol (Gadovist®) versus Gadobenat Dimeglumin (Multihance®) mittels einer MRT Bildgebung bei einem Myorkardinfarkt. Monozentrische, randomisierte, einfach verblindete, cross-over Studie. EUDRACT-Nr.: 2010-022570-13 Prüfplancode: GAD-1140-WIL-0020-I - Gadovit

Gadovit-Studie Intraindividueller Vergleich der diagnostischen Wertigkeit von delayed-enhancement imaging mit Gadobutrol (Gadovist®) versus Gadobenat Dimeglumin (Multihance®) mittels einer MRT Bildgebung bei einem Myorkardinfarkt. Monozentrische, randomisierte, einfach verblindete, cross-over Studie. EUDRACT-Nr.: 2010-022570-13 Prüfplancode: GAD-1140-WIL-0020-I - Gadovit

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2010-022570-13-DE
Enrollment
20
Registered
2010-09-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rupture of a thrombotic plaque within a coronary artery leads to a complete or incomplete occlusion of the vessel with subsequent ischemia in the affected myocardium. If not revascularised within the first 6 hours irreversible necrosis follows acute ischemia with feared complications such as heart rhythm disorders or progressive heart failure. Thus, accurate diagnosis of infarct size and extent is an important task in cardiovascular medicine.

Interventions

Sponsors

Medizinsiche Fakultät der Technischen Universität München
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: inclusion criteria • Diagnosis of or chronic myocardial infarction • Informed consent • Age over 18 years and under 80 years Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: exclusion criteria • Age under 18 years and over 80 years • Absence of an informed consent • Patients with a heart pacemaker, with magnetic material or magnetic implants • Renal failure with GFR < 30ml/min • Patients with known allergy to a Gadolinium-containing contrast agent • Drugs or alcohol addiction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction (MI) is usually based on cardiac enzymes and ECG changes. However exact extent of myocardial infarction and transmurality can only be visualized with high resolution delayed contrast enhancement MRI. Due to the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with renal failure, extravascular standard contrast agents like gadopentetate dimeglumine have to be replaced by macrocyclic contrast agents like gadobutrol or gadobenate dimeglumine. However a contrast agent with a higher molarity or a protein-binding character can cause a reduced contrast between small subendocardial infarcts and the adjacent ventricular blood pool because of the high signal-intensity in the blood pool compared to extravascular standard contrast agents. Contrast to noise ratios (CNRs) between the infarct and the left ventricular cavity as well as between the infarct and the normal myocardium will be compared between gadobutrol versus gadobenat dimeglumin, at simular dose;Secondary Objective: 2 Secondary objective: To compare signal to noise ratio (SNR) of infarct, normal myocardium and left ventricular cavity of both contrast agents ;Primary end point(s): Primary endpoints • Comparison of CNR infarct/left ventricular cavity for gadobutrol and gadobenate dimeglumine at a comparable dose (0.1 mmol/kg) • Comparison of CNR infarct/normal myocardium gadobutrol and gadobenate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg)

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026