Skip to content

A phase 4 pilot study to establish if an intramuscular steroid injection is as effective as an intralesional steroid injection in the treatment of tennis elbow? - MSC808

A phase 4 pilot study to establish if an intramuscular steroid injection is as effective as an intralesional steroid injection in the treatment of tennis elbow? - MSC808

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2010-022131-11-GB
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2010-10-08
Start date
2010-11-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tennis Elbow (Lateral Epicondylitis)

Interventions

Trade Name: Depo-Medrone Product Name: Depo-Medrone Product Code: Depo-Medrone Pharmaceutical Form: Injection*

Sponsors

Whipps Cross University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients deemed by their general practitioners to have a diagnosis of tennis elbow and referred to the outpatient department for further management will be assessed for their suitability for inclusion in the study. Criteria for inclusion in the study would be patients with symptoms of tennis elbow who had not had treatment for this complaint in the preceding 3 months. Symptoms include pain reproduced on palpation of the common extensor origin, pain reproduced on resisted extension of the wrist with the elbow extended. All participants must be age over 18 years. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Criteria Resulting in Exclusion from the Study: 1. Trauma to the affected elbow in the preceding 6 weeks 2. Patients with a past history of elbow instability 3. Previous elbow surgery 4. Bilateral symptoms 5. Any other pathology involving the affected upper limb 6. Coexisting cervical spine pathology 7. Physiotherapy or steroid injection for the presenting condition within the previous 3 months 8. Patients already on oral/systemic steroids 9. Patients with contraindications to injection therapy: (i) Patients with bleeding diatheses or on anticoagulant therapy (ii) Local or systemic infection (iii) Past history of hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics (iv) Poorly controlled diabetics and other immunosuppressed individuals (v) Pregnant or breast feeding patients (vi) Uncooperative patients with an underlying psychiatric diagnosis (vii) Prosthetic elbow joint

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To establish that an intramuscular steroid injection is as effective in relieving pain and improving function at 6 weeks as an intralesional steroid injection. To establish that an intramuscular injection is less painful at the point of delivery than an intralesional steroid injection. ;Secondary Objective: ;Primary end point(s): Primary outcome will be 1. Pain Severity and Functional Disability as assessed by a Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire : 1- Before the injection, 2- 6 weeks later at Follow up, 2. Pain severity at the site of the injection as assessed by a 10 point Likert scale: 1- Immediately after the injection 2- 24 hours later, 3- 48 hours later

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026