Skip to content

Comparison of Slow Efficiency dialysis (SLEDD) with Unfractionated Heparin versus Citrasate in Critically Ill Patients

Comparison of Slow Efficiency dialysis (SLEDD) with Unfractionated Heparin versus Citrasate in Critically Ill Patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2010-021665-68-BE
Enrollment
250
Registered
2010-09-20
Start date
2010-10-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

To compare the feasability, safety and efficacy of Sustained Slow Efficiency Dialys (SLEDD) using regional anticoagulation with Citrasate compared to systemic anticoagulation with Unfractionated Heparin (UF) in critically ill patients. Prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial recruiting patients with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) stage III according to the RIFLE criteria and needing renal replacement therapie. MedDRA version: 12.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10018875 Term: Haemodial

Interventions

Trade Name: Citrasate Product Name: Citrasate Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for haemodialysis CAS Number: 77-92-9 Other descriptive name: CITRIC ACID Concentration unit: g/l gram(s)/litre Concentratio

Sponsors

University Hospital Antwerp
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ? Need for hemodialysis in the ICU for at least one treatment ? No prior hemodialysis treatment in the ICU except continuous renal replacement therapy Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ? Need for systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated or fractionated heparin, oral anticoagulants or intravenous anti-aggregants for other reasons ? Need for continued thrombolysis therapy within the 6 hours before inclusion ? Need for continued treatment with activated protein C (drotrecogin alfa) within the 12 hours before inclusion ? Need for continued treatment with intravenous anti-aggregants (abciximab, eptifabide) withing 12 hours before inclusion ? Liver failure (acute and acute-on-chronic) ? Confirmed or suspected Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) ? Heparin allergies ? Severe uncorrected hypocalcemia (ionized calcium < 0,8 mmol/l) ? Refusal of informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Primary endpoint : The incidence of premature interruptions of the dialysis procedure attributed to hemofilter clotting.;Secondary Objective: Secondary endpoints : ? The incidence of bleeding episodes as defined by the WHO-criteria ? The transfusion requirements ? The incidence of technique failure ? The incidence of metabolic derangements (metabolic alkalosis, metabolic acidosis, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypernatremia, hyponatremia) ? The incidence of citrate intoxication ? The dialysis efficiency expressed as Kt/V and URR Tertiary end points : ? All cause mortality at day 28 and day 90 after inclusion ;Primary end point(s): ? The incidence of premature interruptions of the dialysis procedure attributed to hemofilter clotting

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026