Skip to content

A study in patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) to evaluate safety and effectiveness of a new drug combination compared to 2 other drug combinations that have already been studied in clinical trials. This study will include patients who have already received therapy for their NHL (but it returned or was not completely cured), and now intense chemotherapy is not the best treatment option due to reasons like health or age. The types of NHL include Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and others.

AN OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED, PHASE 3 STUDY OF INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN ADMINISTERED IN COMBINATION WITH RITUXIMAB COMPARED TO DEFINED INVESTIGATOR’S CHOICE THERAPY IN SUBJECTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY CD22-POSITIVE AGGRESSIVE NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA WHO ARE NOT CANDIDATES FOR INTENSIVE HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2010-020147-12-CZ
Enrollment
377
Registered
2010-11-03
Start date
2011-02-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) MedDRA version: 14.1 Level: PT Classification code 10029547 Term: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma System Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)

Interventions

Product Name: Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Product Code: PF-05208773 Pharmaceutical Form: Powder for injection INN or Proposed INN: Inotuzumab ozogamicin CAS Number: N/A Current Sponsor code: PF-05208773 Ot

Sponsors

Pfizer Inc
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Subjects with a diagnosis of CD20 and CD22-positive aggressive NHL (based on local immunophenotyping and histopathology) who have: a. Refractory disease: defined as disease progression while receiving their most recent prior cytotoxic chemotherapy (single-agent immunotherapy as maintenance is not considered cytotoxic therapy); b. Persistent disease: defined as stable disease or partial response at the completion of their most recent prior cytotoxic chemotherapy; c. Relapsed/recurrent disease: defined as complete response at the end of their most recent prior cytotoxic chemotherapy with subsequent relapse or disease recurrence. Eligible aggressive subtypes identified per the 2008 World Health Organization classification include: a) DLBCL (including DLBCL with follicular elements), b) transformed indolent lymphoma with DLBCL, and c) primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphomas. 2. Subjects must have received prior rituximab and may have received up to 3 prior regimens containing cytotoxic chemotherapies for aggressive NHL. In order to ensure consistency in the application of the inclusion criterion: •Only count regimens that contain 1 or more cytotoxic drug. Do not count palliation with steroids alone, vaccines, non-systemic therapy such as radiation, or maintenance therapies such as rituximab. •Only count INDUCTION regimens. Do not count maintenance or consolidation therapy. •If a patient had progression of disease between 2 cytotoxic regimens, they always count as 2 separate regimens. Note: If a regimen was changed (e.g. because the patient did not tolerate it or for financial reasons) and the patient did not progress before the regimen was changed, it is not counted as a separate regimen. •If a patient has transformed indolent lymphoma with DLBCL, only count the regimens received for aggressive lymphoma. 3. Subjects must not be candidates for intensive high-dose chemotherapy, with or without an autologous stem cell transplant (aSCT), due to one or more of the following factors: age, comorbid disease, performance status, prior high-dose chemotherapy, or persisting toxicities from prior chemotherapy. (*transplant preparatory regimen, eg, BEAM, BEAC). 4. Age 18 years or older (For Japan: Age 20 years or older). 5. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) =1.0 x 109/L (1000/µL) and platelets =75 x 10to the power of 9/L (75,000/µL), unless related to bone marrow infiltration. 6. Serum creatinine =1.5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) (or any serum creatinine level associated with a measured or calculated creatinine clearance of =40 mL/min). 7. Total bilirubin =1.5 mg/dL (25.65 µmol/L) unless Gilbert’s syndrome, aspartate and alanine aminotransferase (AST, ALT) =2.5 x ULN. 8. At least 1 measurable disease lesion that is =1.0 cm in 2 perpendicular dimensions, with the product diameter =2.25 cm2 by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Tumor lesions that are located in a previously irradiated area will be considered measurable only if progression is documented following completion of radiation therapy. 9. Negative serum pregnancy test within 1 week before first treatment if the subject is a woman of childbearing potential. A woman of childbearing potential is defined as one who is biologically capable of becoming pregnant. This includes women who are using contraceptives or whose sexual partners are either sterile or using contraceptives. 10. All female and male subjects who are biologically capable of hav

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). 2. Within =6 months before first dose of investigational product: a. Prior treatment with anti-CD22 antibodies; b. Prior radioimmunotherapy. 3. Prior autologous stem cell transplant within =4 months before first dose of investigational product. 4. Contraindication to rituximab. 5. Contraindication to both investigator’s choice immuno-chemotherapy regimens. 6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 4 and/or a life expectancy 470 msec (based on the average of 3 consecutive ECGs). 22. History of chronic liver disease (eg, cirrhosis) or suspected history of alcohol abuse. 23. Administration of a live vaccine =6 weeks before first dose of investigational product. 24. Any major illness/condition or abnormal laboratory finding that, in the investigator’s judgment, will substantially increase the risk associated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: ? To evaluate efficacy as measured by overall survival (OS), with a goal of demonstrating the superiority of inotuzumab ozogamicin when administered in combination with rituximab, compared with an active comparator arm.;Secondary Objective: ? To evaluate the safety and tolerability of inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with rituximab compared to the active comparator arm; ? To evaluate the efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with rituximab, as measured by overall (objective) response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DoR) compared to the active comparator arm; ? To compare patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL), lymphoma specific symptoms, and health status between the treatment arms.;Primary end point(s): Overall survival (OS).;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 5 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): • Progression free survival (PFS); • Overall (objective) response rate (ORR); • Duration of response (DoR); • Patient-reported health-related quality of life, lymphoma specific symptoms, and health status for subjects in each treatment arm as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) and EuroQol-5D (EQ 5D) questionnaires.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Approximately every 3 to 6 months

Countries

Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Ireland, Lithuania, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactClinical Trials.gov Call Centre

Pfizer Inc

ClinicalTrials.govCallCentre@pfizer.com+18007181021

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026