Skip to content

A multicentre randomised trial comparing the effects of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol as a skin, exit site and catheter hub cleansing agent versus other forms of chlorhexidine gluconate which are in routine use, on central venous catheter-related infections in haemodialysis patients

A multicentre randomised trial comparing the effects of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol as a skin, exit site and catheter hub cleansing agent versus other forms of chlorhexidine gluconate which are in routine use, on central venous catheter-related infections in haemodialysis patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2010-019984-12-IE
Enrollment
180
Registered
2010-05-18
Start date
2010-07-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2013-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections in haemodialysis patients. This trial will evaluate the effectiveness of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70%isopropyl alcohol as a skin, exit site and catheter hub cleansing agent in the reduction of CVC-related infections in haemodialysis patients, in comparison to the other forms of chlorhexidine gluconate that are in routine use in dialysis centres in Ireland.

Interventions

Trade Name: ChloraPrep® with Tint 2% w/v / 70% v/v cutaneous solution Pharmaceutical Form: Cutaneous solution INN or Proposed INN: CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE CAS Number: 18472510 Concentration unit: % (

Sponsors

Adelaide & Meath Hospital, incorporating The National Children's Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: •Patients over the age of 18 who require haemodialysis for end stage renal disease (ESRD) •Patients on long term haemodialysis using a permanent tunnelled cuffed CVC •Patients whose permanent tunnelled cuffed CVC has been inserted at least four weeks prior to entry into the study (to avoid recruiting patients who may develop infection secondary to insertion technique) Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: •Patients whose CVC is used for purposes other than access for haemodialysis •Patients with a known allergy to any component of the interventions •Patients whose CVC material is not compatible with interventions •Patients who are using central venous catheters or dressings which are not standard practice for the unit •Patients who are unable to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To compare the effects of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol versus 0.05% aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate or 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol, on the reduction of CVC-related infections (catheter-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-related bloodstream infection and local access infection) in haemodialysis patients.;Primary end point(s): The primary end point with be bloodstream infection secondary to central venous catheter. The CDC/NHSN Laboratory Confirmed Primary Bloodstream Infection definitions (2008) and the Infectious Disease Society of America’s Clinical Definitions of Catheter-related Infections (2009) will be used to diagnose catheter-associated bloodstream infection and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). To enable comparisons with International literature the CDC/NHSN (2009) Dialysis Events specific outcomes measures will also be included. These outcomes are local access infection, access-associated bacteraemia and vascular access infection. The CDC/NHSN Dialysis Events specific outcomes measures are: •Local access infection: Pus, redness or swelling of the vascular access site and access-associated bacteraemia was not present and patient was hospitalised or had initiation of an IV antimicrobial agent. •Access-associated bacteraemia: Positive blood culture with source identified as the vascular access site or unknown. •Vascular access infection: Either local infection or access-associated bacteraemia Bloodstream infections can be classified as either catheter-associated or catheter-related. According to the CDC/NHSN (2008) laboratory confirmed primary bloodstream infections are recorded as catheter-associated bloodstream infections if a CVC was in place at the time of or within 48 hours before the development of the BSI. Laboratory Confirmed Bloodstream Infection must meet at least one of the following criteria Criteria 1: Patient has a recognized pathogen cultured

Countries

Ireland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026