Skip to content

A study to compare the effectiveness and morbidity of Alkalinized Intravesical Lidocaine Vs Lidocaine gel in achieving anaesthesia prior to intravesical Botulinum Toxin (BTX) injections

A study to compare the effectiveness and morbidity of Alkalinized Intravesical Lidocaine Vs Lidocaine gel in achieving anaesthesia prior to intravesical Botulinum Toxin (BTX) injections

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2010-018611-15-GB
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2010-07-06
Start date
2010-10-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2013-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The aim of this randomised study is to compare the effectiveness and morbidity of alkalinized intravesical Lidocaine Vs Lidocaine gel in achieving adequate anaesthesia prior to intravesical injections of Botulinum Toxin (BTX).

Interventions

Trade Name: Sodium Bicarbonate Injection BP Minijet 8.4% w/v. Solution for injection Product Name: Sodium Bicarbonate Injection BP Minijet 8.4% w/v. Solution for injection Product Code: PA 255/1/4 Pha

Sponsors

Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University LHB
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Patients admitted for intravesical Botulinum Toxin A (BTX) injections under flexible cystoscopy guidance • Written informed consent to be obtained Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Patients < 18 years of age • Patients having the procedure under General Anaesthetic • Proven bladder outflow obstruction • Neurological disease that may affect bladder function/sensation. • Patients with urethral catheters or practising Intermittent self catheterisation • Serious concomitant illness • Significant Cardiovascular disease • History of Cardiac arrhythmia or any cardiac conduction disorder • Liver disease • Bleeding disorders • Patients with Supra-pubic or long term urethral catheters • Pregnant or breast feeding patients • Acute urinary tract infection • Any other bladder pathology at the time of cystoscopy (includes trauma, stones, tumour) • Patients with active genital infection, other than genital warts. • Male patients with previous or current history of prostate cancer • Patients with known allergy or sensitivity to any component of the study medication, anaesthetics or antibiotics to be used during the study • Patient is participating in any other study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Main outcome measure will be the difference in the mean visual analogue scale for pain;Secondary Objective: Safety/Adverse Events;Primary end point(s): The main end point study outcome measure will be the difference in the mean visual analogue pain score between groups

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026