We will investigate the thrombogenicity of two different oral contraceptives: dienogest/estradiol valerate (Qlaira) in comparison to levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol (Microgynon-30) used by healthy adult women. To predict the thrombogenicity of the two pills we will measure thormbin generation-based Activated Protein C resistance (nAPCsr) and Sex Hormone Binding Globuline (SHBG) in women randomised to dienogest/estradiol valerate or levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol oral contraceptive pills. MedDR
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Women, age 18-35 years, the wish to use dienogest/estradiol valerate or levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol as an oral contraceptive. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: People who are legally incapable, contra-indications for the use of oral contraceptives as described by the WHO and Dutch Society of Gynaecologists, pregnancy in the three months before the trial, use of medication which can influence coagulation, chronic/acute illness.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Main Objective: To predict the thrombogenicity of a new oral contraceptive composed of dienogest/ethinylestradiol in comparison to an oral contraceptive with a low thrombotic risk, composed of levonorgstrel/ethinylestradiol. ;Secondary Objective: There is no secondary objective.;Primary end point(s): Thrombin generation-based APC-resistance and SHBG as predictors for the risk of venous thromboembolism in women using dienogest/estradiol valerate oral contraceptives or levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol. | — |
Countries
Netherlands