Skip to content

Diagnosis of coronary artery disease with Rubidium-82 PET and Technetium-99m MIBI SPET : a head to head comparison, versus coronary CT angiography

Diagnosis of coronary artery disease with Rubidium-82 PET and Technetium-99m MIBI SPET : a head to head comparison, versus coronary CT angiography - Rubidium-82 PET and Tc-99m-MIBI SPET: a head to head comparison.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2009-016645-25-GB
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2010-10-22
Start date
2010-12-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The main purpose of this study is to compare myocardial perfusion imaging using Rubidium-82 PET with Tc-99m-MIBI SPET in the evaluation of significant Coronary Artery disease.

Interventions

Trade Name: CardioGen-82 Product Name: CardioGen-82 Pharmaceutical Form: Radionuclide generator INN or Proposed INN: NA CAS Number: NA Current Sponsor code: NA Other descriptive name: RUBIDIUM (82 RB)

Sponsors

Advanced Accelerator Applications
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Referred for scintigraphy to assess myocardial ischaemia. - Ability to give informed written consent Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 68 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 67

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Impaired capacity to consent - Pregnancy, or breastfeeding - Allergy to iv contrast - Renal failure - Severe, uncontrolled asthma - Claustrophobia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The primary objective is to compare PET vs SPET, with the primary outcome being the sensitivity of detecting significant coronary artery disease (as defined as being >70% stenosis, on coronary CT angiography).;Secondary Objective: The secondary objectives are to evaluate the performance of Rubidium-82 as compared to Tc-99m-MIBI, in terms of clinical interpretation, per-cent myocardium that is hypoperfused, artefacts and image quality and determine patient tolerance with each technique.;Primary end point(s): The primary outcome is to assess the efficacy of PET versus SPET. This will be assessed by using a diagnostic decision matrix (Specificity, True Positive, True Negative, False Positive, False Negative) and coronary CT angiography is used as the reference standard.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Timepoint of evaluation of primary and secondary endpoints is Day 1 (or at Day 2 according to patient BMI-determined Technetium-99m-MIBI myocardial perfusion imaging protocol).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): NA;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: NA

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactPaola Santoro

Advanced Accelerator Applications

paola.santoro@adacap.com39125561221

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026