Skip to content

A clinical trial to compare tolerabilty and efficiacy (how well the drug works) of following treatments: Blocking liver arteries (chemoembolisation) by beads loaded with irinotecan (chemotherapeutic) and intravenous administration of cetuximab (chemotherapeutic) compared to administration of intravenous cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with k-ras (gene) wild-type tumors.

A randomized phase II trial of irinotecan drug-eluting beads administered by hepatic chemoembolization with intravenous cetuximab (DEBIRITUX) versus systemic treatment with intravenous cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer and k-ras wild-type tumours - DEBIRITUX

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2009-014728-44-DE
Enrollment
80
Registered
2009-11-04
Start date
2010-01-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2013-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with unresectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer who previously failed pretreatment with 5FU/oxaliplatin and/or 5FU/irinotecan (2nd- or 3rd-line). MedDRA version: 14.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10052362 Term: Metastatic colorectal cancer System Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)

Interventions

Trade Name: Campto Pharmaceutical Form: Suspension for injection INN or Proposed INN: IRINOTECAN CAS Number: 97682445 Concentration unit: mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre Concentration type: equal Concen

Sponsors

Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Patients with confirmed diagnosis of stage IV (UICC) colorectal cancer with unresectable liver metastases (primary tumour may be present) and k-ras wild-type tumours 2) Patients had been treated and shown to be refractory to 5-FU (Capecitabine allowed)/oxaliplatin and/or 5-FU/irinotecan. Prior therapy with VEGF-inhibitors (e.g bevacizumab) is allowed 3) Patients with at least one measurable liver metastasis, with size > 1cm (RECIST criteria) 4) Patients with liver only or liver dominant disease (defined as = 50 % tumour burden confined to the liver) 5) Patients with a portal vein not interfering with transarterial chemoembolization (e.g. no thrombosis) as judged by the investigator 6) ECOG Performance status = 2 7) Life expectancy > 3 months 8) Age = 18 years. 9) At least 4 weeks since last administration of last chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (bone metastases may be allowed) 10) Patients who received VEGF-inhibition (e.g. with bevacizumab) in prior therapy are eligible if stopped since 4-6 weeks before randomization 11) Haematologic function: ANC = 1.5 x 109/L, platelets = 75 x109/L 12) INR =65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 80

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Presence of CNS metastases 2) Contradindications to irinotecan therapy (Chronic inflammatory bowel disease and/or bowel obstruction, history of severe hypersensitivity reactions to irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate) 3) Active bacterial, viral or fungal infection within 72 hours of study entry 4) Women who are pregnant or breast feeding 5) Allergy to contrast media 6) Presence of another concurrent malignancy. Prior malignancy in the last 5 years except adequately treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix 7) Any contraindication for hepatic embolisation procedures: • Large shunt as determined by the investigator (pretesting with lung perfusion scan not required) • Severe atheromatosis • Hepatofugal blood flow 8) Other significant medical or surgical condition, or any medication or treatment, that would place the patient at undue risk, that would preclude the safe use of chemoembolization or would interfere with study participation 9) Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to the drugs used in the trial (eg: cetuximab, 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, or any component of aprepitant)

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Rate of acute and delayed emesis during chemoembolization with or without aprepitant ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Irinotecan Beads in combination with intravenous cetuximab versus intravenous irinotecan in combination with intravenous cetuximab in the treatment of patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.;Secondary Objective: Secondary objectives are safety and tolerability of hepatic chemoembolization. ;Primary end point(s): Progression free survival rate after 6 months;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactStudienkoordination

Koordinierungszentrum für Klinische Studien

info@kks-halle.de+493455574907

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026