Skip to content

Multicenter randomized open clinical trial for `lock` efficacy assessment of totally implantable vascular access device with saline solution vs heparin - SOFISEP

Multicenter randomized open clinical trial for `lock` efficacy assessment of totally implantable vascular access device with saline solution vs heparin - SOFISEP

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2009-013620-22-IT
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2009-11-16
Start date
2009-10-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer patients with totally implantable vascular access device

Interventions

Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection INN or Proposed INN: Heparin Concentration unit: U/ml unit(s)/millilitre Concentration type: equal Concentration number: 50- Pharmaceutical Form: Solution

Sponsors

AZIENDA SANITARIA LOCALE BI DI BIELLA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Oncohaematology or cancer patients (except leukemia),candidate to receive chemotherapy intravenously, with an estimated survival of more than 3 months; Presence of a ``Port`` with a catheter open-ended (planted not later than 45 days, not previously used for administration of therapy); Age >= 18 years; Performance Status Kornofsky: 100-60; Patient able to read, understand and provide the required informed consent for participation in the study. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with leukemia disease; Patients with ``port`` complications; Patients with previous events of system failure before recruitment; Performance Status Kornofsky <60; Patients whith ``port`` used for administration of parenteral nutrition with lipids; Patients with known or suspected heparin intolerance/allergy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Assessment of ``port`` occlusion incidence connected to the different types of flushing;Secondary Objective: Assessment of relationship between costs and efficacy of two types of flushing; Assessment of port infections incidence connected to the type of flushing; Assessement of other not&#8722;infectious complications incidence of the ``port`` connected to the type of flushing;Primary end point(s): Main outcome: ``Port`` failure for lumen occlusion

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026