Skip to content

A controlled randomized open-label multicentre study evaluating if early initiation of everolimus (Certican®)and early elimination of cyclosporine (Sandimmun Neoral®) in de novo heart transplant recipients can improve long-term renal function and slow down the progression of chronic allograft vasculopathy. - Schedule

A controlled randomized open-label multicentre study evaluating if early initiation of everolimus (Certican®)and early elimination of cyclosporine (Sandimmun Neoral®) in de novo heart transplant recipients can improve long-term renal function and slow down the progression of chronic allograft vasculopathy. - Schedule

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2009-013074-41-SE
Enrollment
100
Registered
2009-08-27
Start date
2009-11-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart transplantation MedDRA version: 16.1 Level: PT Classification code 10019314 Term: Heart transplant System Organ Class: 10042613 - Surgical and medical procedures

Interventions

Trade Name: Certican Product Name: Certican Product Code: RAD001 Pharmaceutical Form: Tablet CAS Number: 159351-69-6 Other descriptive name: EVEROLIMUS Concentration unit: mg milligram(s)

Sponsors

Novartis Norge AS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: To be fulfilled at the time of transplantation and before entering period 1 of the study - Male or female cardiac recipients 18-70 years of age undergoing primary heart transplantation. The graft must be functional at the time of randomization. - Patient willing and capable of giving written informed consent for study participation and anticipated to be able to participate in the study for 12 months - Patients received induction therapy with ATG (Thymoglobulin) At time of entering period 2: - Patients completed period 1 on the maintained immunosuppressive regimen they were randomized to within the target doses and levels specified for each group. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: To be fulfilled at the time of transplantation and before entering period 1 of the study 1. Recipient of multi-organ transplants or previously transplanted organs 2. Patients with donor greater than 70 years 3. Donor heart cold ischemic time > 6 hours. 4. Patients who are recipients of ABO incompatible transplants 5. Patients with platelet count 9 mmol/l and or triglycerides (TG) >6 mmol/l despite lipid lowering treatment 7.Patients with ongoing wound healing problems or other severe surgical complication in the opinion of the investigator 8.Patient with a current clinically severe systemic infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To compare the efficacy between treatment regimes by assessing the difference in renal function evaluated by measured glomerular function rate (mGFR) 12 months after heart transplantation (HTX). ;Secondary Objective: To compare the efficacy between treatment regimens by assessing the difference in -Progression of chronic allograft vasculopathy (CAV) assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination -Renal function; change of GFR from visit 5 (week 7-11) to Month 12 -Renal function; cGFR (MDRD formula) at each follow-up visit -Number of rejections -Occurrence of treatment failures up to or at 12 months -Development and magnitude of proteinuria -Lipid profile at 12 months -Quality of Life assessed by SF-36, EQ 5D and Becks -Hemodynamic variables -Left ventricular function -Optional: Working capacity (Peak oxygen uptake at week 7 and month 12) -Metabolic parameters -Inflammatory variables -Safety and tolerability -Optional: Measurements of microvascular circulation in connection to the IVUS examinations ;Primary end point(s): •Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR),Cr-EDTA clearance at week 7-11 and at 12 months •Development of CAV : Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) and Virtual Histology (VH) •Number of rejections •Number of treatment failures

Countries

Denmark, Norway, Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026