Skip to content

Role of 18F-FLT PET/CT for evaluating suspect lesions in patients with malignant lymphoma - 18F-FLT-LINFOMA-03/2009

Role of 18F-FLT PET/CT for evaluating suspect lesions in patients with malignant lymphoma - 18F-FLT-LINFOMA-03/2009

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2009-012561-56-IT
Enrollment
100
Registered
2009-10-02
Start date
2009-09-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

malignant lymphoma (evaluating suspect lesions) MedDRA version: 12.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10025315 Term: Lymphoma malignant

Interventions

Product Name: 18-Fluor-desoxy-fluortimidine Product Code: 18F-FLT Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection INN or Proposed INN: 18-Fluor-desoxy-fluortimidine Current Sponsor code: 18F-FLT Concentra

Sponsors

AZIENDA OSPEDALIERA DI BOLOGNA POLICLINICO S. ORSOLA M. MALPIGHI
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. patients diagnosed with 2. Age > 18 3. signed informed consent Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnancy 2. Breastfeeding 3. Healthy volunteers 4. Age <18 5. Patients in emergency situation 6. patients of un sound mind 7. patients who dont sign the informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To evaluate the specificity of 18F-FLT PET to identify the presence of residual disease or recurrence in patients affected by lymphoma. Patients will be selected on the basis of a 18F-FDG PET resulted positive or suspect for relapse or residual disease;Secondary Objective: To compare the specificity of 18F-FLT PET with that of 18F-FDG PET (the tracer usually employed at present) . To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 18F-FLT PET as compared to biopsy after 18F-FDG PET (the tracer usually employed at present);Primary end point(s): Specificity of 18F-FLT PET to identify areas of increased tracer uptake and thus increased proliferation will be evaluated by comparison of PET results with biopsy results

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026