Skip to content

Comparison between two different dosages of remifentanil administered by a patient controlled tecnique (PCSA) for diagnostic and andoscopich procedures. - ND

Comparison between two different dosages of remifentanil administered by a patient controlled tecnique (PCSA) for diagnostic and andoscopich procedures. - ND

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2009-010383-42-IT
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2009-03-31
Start date
2009-02-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

patients affected by patologies to be submitted to endoscopic investigation MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10014805 Term: Endoscopy

Interventions

Trade Name: ULTIVA Pharmaceutical Form: Powder and solvent for solution for infusion INN or Proposed INN: Remifentanil Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration type: equal Concentration numbe

Sponsors

OSPEDALE S. RAFFAELE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients aged more than 18 years old; ASA physical status I-II;patients candidate for diagnostic or operative intervention of endoscopic type on gastrointestinal tract. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients aged under 18 years old; pregnancy fenmale patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: to define the adequate dosage of remifentanil and to define if PCSA can produce an adequate analgesic effect with a speeder recover without increase of the incidence of adverse events.;Secondary Objective: to define the adequate dosage of remifentanil and to define if PCSA can produce an adequate analgesic effect with a speeder recover without increase of the incidence of adverse events.;Primary end point(s): patient`s satisfaction expressed by cents of VAs with SD of 12/10 (inferred by previous study of our group)

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026