Skip to content

Abciximab versus Eptifibatide versus Bivalirudin during PCI in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Abciximab versus Eptifibatide versus Bivalirudin during PCI in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2009-009039-32-SE
Enrollment
180
Registered
2009-02-26
Start date
2009-04-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ST elevation myocardial infarction and non ST elevation myocardial infarction/unstable angina MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10000920 Term: Acute myocardial infarction, subendocardial infarction MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10000891 Term: Acute myocardial infarction MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10002385 Term: Angina pectoris unstable

Interventions

Trade Name: Reopro Product Name: Reopro Pharmaceutical Form: Concentrate for solution for infusion Trade Name: Angiox Product Name: Angiox Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for infusion Trade Name: inte

Sponsors

Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age over 18 years. 2. Patients with STEMI, treated with primary PCI or patients with NSTEMI treated with PCI. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Intolerance to abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban, ASA eller clopidogrel. Increased risk for bleedings Patients with prior hemmoragic stroke Patients with ischemic stroke the last 6 months Patients with gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding the last two months Patients with ongoing warfarin or oral thrombin inhibitor treatment Patients treated recently with thrombolysis (rescue PCI) History of Heparin induced trombocytopenia (HIT) Known platelet count =100.000 per deciliter Known hemoglobin level = 10mg per deciliter Known renal failure with serum creatinine levels over 200 µmol/L History of prior myocardial infarction History of medically treated angina pectoris History of prior PCI or CABG Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock Presence of systemic disease with a less than a year expected life duration Patient`s unweeling in participating in the study Difficulties in communication between the medical stuff and the patient, even due to language problems or due to the patients` disease status

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To compare three different anticoagulation strategies during PCI in terms of platelet aggregation and neutrofiles activation;Secondary Objective: To compare three different anticoagulation strategies during PCI in terms of clinical efficacy and safety;Primary end point(s): Platelet activation measured with multiple electrode aggregometry immediately after PCI with TRAP as agonist.

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026