Skip to content

A Phase III, Randomized, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of MK-0826/Ertapenem and Meropenem in Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

A Phase III, Randomized, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of MK-0826/Ertapenem and Meropenem in Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2008-003923-21-FR
Enrollment
680
Registered
2008-11-14
Start date
2008-12-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complicated urinary tract infection MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10046571 Term: Urinary tract infection

Interventions

Trade Name: INVANZ Product Name: Invanz Pharmaceutical Form: Powder for injection* INN or Proposed INN: Ertapenem Concentration unit: g

Sponsors

Merck & Co., Inc.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient has a clinically suspected and /or bacteriologically documented complicated UTI or acute pyelonephritis judged by the investigator to be serious. Patient has one positive urine culture within 48 hours of enrollment. Patient has one or more signs or symptoms of either upper or lower UTI. Patient is male with or without a bladder catheter or urologic abnormalities; OR patient is a female with a history or clinical evidence of one or more urologic abnormalities. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient has received any amount of effective concomitant antibiotic therapy after obtaining the urine culture for admission to this study (admission urine culture) and prior to the administration of the first dose of study antibiotics. Patient's infection has been treated with greater than 24 hours of systemic antibiotic therapy known to be effective against the presumed or documented pathogens within the 72 hour period immediately prior to consideration for entry into the study. Patient has complete obstruction of any portion of the urinary tract. Patient has a history of seizures other than an uncomplicated febrile seizure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: 1) To compare the efficacy of ertapenem with respect to the overall microbiological response assessment profile in the treatment of patients with serious (requiring hospitalization and treatment with parenteral therapy) complicated UTIs, including acute pyelonephritis, with that of the meropenem control group at the 5 to 9 days posttherapy (EFU/TOC) follow-up visit. 2) To compare the efficacy of ertapenem with respect to the clinical response assessment profile in the treatment of patients with serious complicated UTIs, including acute pyelonephritis, with that of the meropenem control group at completion of parenteral therapy (DCIV). 3) To compare the efficacy of ertapenem with respect to the overall microbiological response assessment profile in the treatment of patients with serious complicated UTIs, including acute pyelonephritis, with that of the meropenem control group at DCIV. 4) To evaluate the safety profile of ertapenem at DCIV.;Secondary Objective: 1) To compare the efficacy of ertapenem with respect to the overall clinical response assessment profile in the treatment of patients with serious complicated UTIs, including acute pyelonephritis, with that of the meropenem control group at the 5 to 9 days posttherapy (EFU/TOC) follow-up visit. 2) To compare the efficacy of ertapenem with respect to the proportion of patients with sustained microbiological and clinical response in the treatment of patients with serious complicated UTIs, including acute pyelonephritis, with that of the meropenem control group, measured at the LFU visit.; Primary end point(s): Favorable microbiological response assessment at the EFU/TOC visit. Favorable clinical response assessment at DCIV. Favorable microbiological response assessment at DCIV.

Countries

Bulgaria, France, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026