Skip to content

Comparison between two different sedation strategies (propofol versus propofol plus ketamine) in deep sedation managed by non anesthesiologists. - Propofol versus propofol plus ketamine in non anesthesiologists managed deep sedation

Comparison between two different sedation strategies (propofol versus propofol plus ketamine) in deep sedation managed by non anesthesiologists. - Propofol versus propofol plus ketamine in non anesthesiologists managed deep sedation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2008-001493-32-IT
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2008-10-02
Start date
2008-06-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Procedural deep sedation (gastrointestinal endoscopy, lumbar puncture, etc) MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10002091 Term: Anaesthesia

Interventions

Trade Name: KETANEST S Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection INN or Proposed INN: Ketamine Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration type: equal Concentration number: 50- Pharmaceutical

Sponsors

ISTITUTO PER L'INFANZIA BURLO GAROFOLO
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology)1 and 2 children (1-18 years) scheduled for elective deep sedation for diagnostic procedures Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) no F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children ASA 3 and more, presence of risk factors for loss of airway patency.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To asses safety and efficacy of two different strategies of deep sedation managed by non anesthesiologists. Number of sedations successfully performed, side effects.;Secondary Objective: To evaluate quality of sedation (pain during propofol injection, recovery time, characteristics of arousal, post-sedation vomiting), reduction in propofol dosage/kg, costs.;Primary end point(s): Number of sedations successfully managed, number and severity of fall in arterial oxygen saturation.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026