Skip to content

Multi-center, randomized comparison study to eVALUatE outcomes and resource needs of imaging and treatment following Primovist-enhanced MRI of the liver in comparison to extracellular contrast media (ECCM)-enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in patients with a history of colorectal cancer and known or suspected metachronous liver metastases - Primovist VALUE study

Multi-center, randomized comparison study to eVALUatE outcomes and resource needs of imaging and treatment following Primovist-enhanced MRI of the liver in comparison to extracellular contrast media (ECCM)-enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in patients with a history of colorectal cancer and known or suspected metachronous liver metastases - Primovist VALUE study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2008-000583-16-AT
Enrollment
660
Registered
2008-07-21
Start date
2009-03-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with history of colorectal cancer and known or suspected metachronous liver metastasis(es) scheduled to undergo contrast-enhanced tomographic imaging (i.e. CE-MRI or CE-CT) of the liver MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10052358 Term: Colorectal cancer metastatic

Interventions

Trade Name: Primovist 0.25 mmol/ml Injektionslösung, Fertigspritze Product Name: Primovist 0,25 mmol/ml Injektionslösung, Fertigspritze Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection INN or Proposed INN:

Sponsors

Bayer Schering Pharma AG (BSP)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with known or suspected metachronous liver metastases secondary to colorectal cancer who are scheduled for further contrast-enhanced tomographic imaging 2. Patients willing to undergo the study procedures 3. Patients who are fully informed about the study and have signed the informed consent form Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients (men or women) under 18 years of age 2. Patients who have previously entered this study 3. Patients who have received any contrast material within 24 hours before injection of study drug, or who are scheduled to receive any contrast material within 24 hours after injection 4. Patients who have received or will receive any investigational drug 48 hours before injection of the study drug or during study participation. 5. Women who are pregnant, lactating or who are of childbearing potential and have not had a negative urine pregnancy test at baseline visit(s). 6. Patients not eligible to contrast media (CM) injection according to product labeling 7. Patients scheduled for liver-specific MRI other than Primovist-enhanced MRI, e.g. Multihance-, Teslascan- or SPIO-enhanced MRI 8. Patients who require emergency treatment 9. Patients who are clinically unstable and whose clinical course is unpredictable (e.g. due to previous surgery, acute myocardial infarction) 10. Patients with any physical or mental status that interferes with the signing of informed consent 11. Patients with known anaphylactoid or anaphylactic reaction to any contrast media or hypersensitivity to any allergen including drugs 12. Patients with a contraindication for MRI or CT. 13. Patients with impaired renal function (e.g. acute renal failure) or patients on dialysis. 14. Close affiliation with the investigational site; e.g., a relative of the investigator, dependent person (e.g., employee or student of the investigational site)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The main objective of this study is to evaluate outcomes and resource needs of imaging and treatment following Primovist-enhanced MRI (PV-MRI) as compared to ECCM-enhanced MRI (ECCM-MRI) and contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) in patients with a history of colorectal cancer and known or suspected metachronous liver metastases based on the evaluation of the following: • Proportion of patients for whom further imaging is required to come to a therapy decision after initial imaging of the liver with either PV-MRI, ECCM-MRI or CE-CT (primary efficacy variable) • Proportion of patients with intra-operatively modified surgical plans based on either PV-MRI, ECCM-MRI or CE-CT • Diagnostic performance of either PV-MRI, ECCM-MRI or CE-CT in comparison to final diagnosis • Confidence in diagnosis and therapeutic decision • Resource needs for imaging and treatment after either PV-MRI, ECCM-MRI or CE-CT ;Secondary Objective: Another objective of this study is to assess safety of PV-MRI as compared to ECCM-MRI and CE-CT in patients with a history of colorectal cancer and known or suspected liver metastases based on the evaluation of adverse events.;Primary end point(s): Proportion of patients in each of the three treatment groups for whom further imaging is required after initial imaging to come to a therapy decision

Countries

Austria, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026