Skip to content

Randomized phase II study of adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin + vinorelbine vs gemcitabine + vinorelbine in stage IB-IIIA radically resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients - MADS

Randomized phase II study of adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin + vinorelbine vs gemcitabine + vinorelbine in stage IB-IIIA radically resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients - MADS

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2008-000570-21-IT
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2008-11-07
Start date
2008-02-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10061873 Term: Non-small cell lung cancer

Interventions

Trade Name: VINORELBINE P.FABRE 50 Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for infusion INN or Proposed INN: Vinorelbine Concentration unit: mg/m2 milligram(s)/square meter Concentration type: equal Concentrati

Sponsors

IST - ISTITUTO NAZIONALE PER LA RICERCA SUL CANCRO
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Written informed consent 2. Age > 18 years. 3. ECOG Performance status 10 gr/dl ANC > 1.500/mm3 Platelets> 100.000/mm3 Bilirubin ≤ 2 x ULN AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase ≤ 3.0 x ULN Creatinine =65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient refusal treatment not in the best interest of the patient, according to the responsible physician excessive toxicity precluding further therapy, according to the responsible physician treatment delay of more than 2 weeks tumor progression prior chemotherapy pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To evaluate the tolerability (in terms of drug delivery and toxicity) of cisplatin+vinorelbine and gemcitabine+vinorelbine regimens;Secondary Objective: 1. Time to progression disease 2. Overall survival 3. To achieve a biological markers- based predictive model leading to select patients that could take advantage from this treatment. 4. Tumor biological characterization 5. Integrated evaluation of cardiovascular, respiratory and of quality of life outcome;Primary end point(s): This study is designed, in each arm, according to a Bryant and Day design with the following primary endpoints 1. Success of treatment delivery : to be considered as a ?success? a patient should a. have received 4 cycles of chemotherapy b. with a relative dose intensity over the four cycles of 80% or more for each drug c. have been treated according to the treatment arm allocated at randomization 2. Toxicity: absence of any grade 4 toxicity during chemotherapy

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026