Skip to content

Effects of a 10 or 15 mg single intravenous bolus of ivabradine versus placebo on heart rate control during a multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. A randomised, double blind, international, multicenter study.

Effects of a 10 or 15 mg single intravenous bolus of ivabradine versus placebo on heart rate control during a multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. A randomised, double blind, international, multicenter study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2007-006793-28-NL
Enrollment
330
Registered
2008-06-02
Start date
2008-09-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart rate control during a MultiSlice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (MST CA) for the evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease MedDRA version: 11.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10060804 Term:

Interventions

Product Name: S 16257 Product Code: S 16257 Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection INN or Proposed INN: ivabradine CAS Number: 155974-00-8 Current Sponsor code: S 16257 Concentration unit: mg/ml

Sponsors

Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (I.R.I.S)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Planned to undergo a scheduled MSCT CA for the evaluation of suspected or known CAD, - Not eligible for intravenous beta-blockers, - Electrocardiographic documentation of sinus rhythm and a stable heart rate, greater or equal to 70 bpm, - Able to perform a 20 seconds breath-hold, Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ­- Current unstable clinical condition ­- NYHA functional classification IV - ­Scheduled coronary revascularisation, ­- Permanent atrial fibrillation or flutter, - Severe obstructive valvular disease, - Congenital heart disease, - ­Implanted pacemaker with atrial or ventricular permanent pacing, ­- Sick sinus syndrome or sinoatrial block, - ­2nd or 3rd degree atrio-ventricular block, ­- History of recurrent episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmia unless an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is present, - ­Family history of long QT syndrome, congenital long QT symdrome, or treated with QT prolonging products, - ­Severe or uncontrolled hypertension, - Severe hypotension or symptomatic hypotension, - ­Suspicion of aortic dissection or thoracic aortic aneurysm, - Suspicion of pulmonary embolism.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary end point(s): Proportion of patients achieving heart rate control (i.e., a HR below or equal to 65 bpm) with intravenous ivabradine versus placebo at the time of initiation of image acquisition during a MSCT CA procedure;Main Objective: The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that during a planned Multislice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (MSCT CA) for the evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease, ivabradine administered intravenously is superior to placebo in achieving heart rate control in patients not eligible for intravenous beta-blockers.;Secondary Objective: The secondary objectives are to assess versus placebo during the Multislice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (MSCT CA) for the evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease: (a) the safety of intravenous ivabradine, and (b) the procedural convenience of the use of intravenous ivabradine.

Countries

Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026