Skip to content

Is a single dose intramuscular (IM) triamcinolone acetonide injection more effective in treating symptomatic flare in established rheumatoid arthritis than equivalent dose of oral prednisolone? - Treatment comparison for symptomatic flare in RA

Is a single dose intramuscular (IM) triamcinolone acetonide injection more effective in treating symptomatic flare in established rheumatoid arthritis than equivalent dose of oral prednisolone? - Treatment comparison for symptomatic flare in RA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2007-006729-28-GB
Enrollment
58
Registered
2007-12-04
Start date
2008-01-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of equivalent doses of IM triamcinolone acetonide and oral prednisolone in controlling a symptomatic flare in patients with established RA. MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10060732 Term: Rheumatoid arthritis flare up

Interventions

Trade Name: Kenalog Product Name: Triamcinolone acetonide Pharmaceutical Form: Injection* INN or Proposed INN: TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE CAS Number: 76255 Concentration unit: IU/mg international unit(s)

Sponsors

Trafford NHS Trust
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a. Age > 18 years b. Diagnosis of RA according to the 1987 ACR criteria c. Continuous stable DMARD treatment for > 3 months d. Active disease with > 6 swollen joints e. Active disease with > 6 tender joints f. Informed written patient consent Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Contraindicated for parenteral steroids (e.g. hypersensitivity to steroids, history of psychological events to steroids, systemic infection). 2. Contraindicated for oral steroids (e.g. hypersensitivity to steroids, history of psychological events to steroids, systemic infection). 3. Subjects suffering from any infection or currently taking antibiotics. 4. Subjects currently receiving steroid treatment. 5. Subjects who have received steroid treatment within the previous 3 months. 6. Subjects receiving anti-TNF therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of equivalent doses of IM triamcinolone acetonide and oral prednisolone in controlling a symptomatic flare in patients with established RA.;Secondary Objective: To identify the magnitude and duration of effect of the two treatments.;Primary end point(s): The DAS 28 score will be used to measure disease activity. This comprises the number of swollen and tender joints out of 28, the subject’s global assessment the ESR. Assessments will be made by the researcher at two-weekly intervals from week 0 (baseline) to week 8 (endpoint). The frequency of assessments is intended to establish any significant difference in duration and magnitude of effect at each assessment. Effectiveness of treatment will be assessed by measuring the change in the overall DAS28 score from baseline at weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8. The Disease Activity Score is widely used to quantify disease activity and gauge response to treatment, and the 28 joint version (DAS28) is used in the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) guidelines.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026