BP is a serious condition with a significant associated morbidity and mortality rate. Widespread tense and haemorrhagic blisters, skin erosions and severe itching cause patients a great deal of distress and pain. It occurs mainly in the elderly. The mortality rate in treated patients is estimated to range from 20% - 40% at one year. MedDRA version: 14.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10006568 Term: Bullous pemphigoid NOS
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: • Aged at least eighteen years old. • Able to provide written informed consent. • Diagnosed with bullous pemphigoid defined as: o Clinical features consistent with bullous pemphigoid. • To be eligible for the study, the patient will need to have either a positive direct or indirect immuno- fluorescence. o Direct or indirect (serum) immuno-fluorescence (linear IgG/C3 at epidermal basement membrane zone) positive for bullous pemphigoid. • At least three significant blisters at two or more body sites that have appeared in the week prior to study enrolment. Significant blisters are defined as intact blisters containing fluid which are at least 5mm in diameter. However, if the patient has popped a blister, or the blister is at a site that makes it susceptible to bursting such as the sole of the foot, it can be considered part of the blister count, providing there is a flexible (but not dry) roof present over a moist base. • Free of blisters and any treatment for bullous pemphigoid for at least one year. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: • Received any of the study medications or other recognised systemic medications for the treatment of this episode of bullous pemphigoid prior to study entry. Prior topical treatment is permitted. • Recent administration of a live virus vaccine. • Mainly or entirely mucosal bullous pemphigoid. • Known allergy to tetracyclines. • Presence of any condition which precludes the use of either of the study drugs. • Women who are taking the oral contraceptive pill, who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the study duration or lactating. Women of childbearing potential must be using adequate contraception and be prepared to avoid pregnancy while participating in the study. • Cancer (apart from basal cell carcinoma). • Has any other condition which would, in the Investigators opinion, deem the patient unsuitable for participation in the study. • Taking part in any other intervention study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary Objective: • To assess the cost-effectiveness of the two treatments.; Main Objective: • To assess whether doxycycline can be considered as non-inferior to prednisolone in effectiveness for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid given an accepted non-inferiority margin. • To assess the safety of doxycycline compared with the prednisolone for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid. ; Primary end point(s): • Difference between the two treatment arms in the proportion of participants classed as treatment success at 6 weeks. Treatment success is defined as 5 or less significant blisters present on examination at 6 weeks. Significant blisters are defined as intact blisters containing fluid which are at least 5mm in diameter. However, if the patient has popped a blister, or the blister is at a site that makes it susceptible to bursting such as the sole of the foot, it can be considered part of the blister count, providing there is a flexible (but not dry) roof present over a moist base. • Difference between the two treatment arms in the number of reported grade 3, 4 and 5 (mortality) adverse events for one year following the start of study treatment. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0) will be used to grade adverse events. At each study visit, participants will be questioned about adverse events they have experienced since the last study visit (using a standard list of known side effects of the two study drugs). | — |
Countries
Germany, United Kingdom