Skip to content

A Comparative Study Of A 6-Month Infliximab (Remicade) Or Placebo Regimen In Undifferentiated Arthritis At High Risk For The Development Of Rheumatoid Arthritis : Clinical, Radiological (MRI) And Synovial Benefit P1200/001. - INFLIXIMAB (REMICADE) in UA

A Comparative Study Of A 6-Month Infliximab (Remicade) Or Placebo Regimen In Undifferentiated Arthritis At High Risk For The Development Of Rheumatoid Arthritis : Clinical, Radiological (MRI) And Synovial Benefit P1200/001. - INFLIXIMAB (REMICADE) in UA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2007-004694-26-BE
Enrollment
30
Registered
2007-09-10
Start date
2007-09-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient with undifferentiated arthritis and the presence of anti-CCP antibodies are at high risk to develop RA MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10039073 Term: Rheumatoid arthritis

Interventions

Trade Name: Remicade Product Name: REMICADE® (Infliximab) Product Code: - Pharmaceutical Form: Powder for infusion* Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Solution for infusion Route of administration o

Sponsors

Saint-Luc Universitary Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of UA Absence of ACR criteria Active UA defined by a swollen joint count = 1 and 3 months), if needed washout of 4 weeks NSAIDs stable Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Other rheumatic inflammatory diagnosis. Contraindication to MRI (pace-maker, etc.) Congestive heart disease Active or latent tuberculosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To compare the induction therapy with infliximab versus placebo on the synovitis and MRI score in undifferentiated arthritis. ;Secondary Objective: 1. To test the hypothesis that induction therapy with infliximab is followed by a better clinical outcome over a 2 year follow-up and defined as an absence of ACR criteria. 2. To test the hypothesis that the effects of infliximab on synovial histology. 3. To test the hypothesis that infliximab can influence the presence of anti CCP antibodies. ;Primary end point(s): Primary endpoint : To compare the induction therapy with infliximab versus placebo on the synovitis and MRI score in undifferentiated arthritis. The secondary endpoints of the study are as follows: 1.To test the hypothesis that induction therapy with infliximab is followed by a better clinical outcome over a 2 year follow-up and defined as an absence of ACR criteria. 2.To test the hypothesis that the effects of infliximab on synovial histology. 3.To test the hypothesis that infliximab can influence the presence of anti CCP antibodies.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026