Skip to content

A trial comparing the current standard treatment (gemcitabine) to the experimental, combined treatments of gemcitabine plus capecitabine.

European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer - Trial 4. Combination versus single agent chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic ductal and peri-ampullary cancers. - ESPAC-4

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2007-004299-38-GB
Enrollment
1396
Registered
2007-12-13
Start date
2008-09-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Resectable pancreatic or peri-ampullary cancers MedDRA version: 14.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10033602 Term: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma resectable System Organ Class: 100000004864 MedDRA version: 14.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10034446 Term: Periampullary carcinoma resectable System Organ Class: 100000004864

Interventions

Trade Name: Gemzar 200mg Product Name: gemcitabine Product Code: Gem Pharmaceutical Form: Powder for solution for infusion INN or Proposed INN: gemcitabine CAS Number: 95058-81-4 Current Sponsor code:

Sponsors

The University of Liverpool
Lead Sponsor
The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1A. Patients who have undergone complete macroscopic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (R0 or R1 resection). 1B. Patients who have undergone complete macroscopic resection for peri-ampullary carcinoma (R0 or R1 resection). 2. Completion of all pre-operative investigations. 3. Histological confirmation of the primary diagnosis. 4. Histological examination of all resection margins. 5. Patients randomised ideally within 12 weeks of surgery, although case by case the CI will consider patients up to 14 weeks, and can begin treatment ideally within 14 weeks of surgery. 6. No evidence of malignant ascites, liver metastasis, spread to other distant abdominal organs, peritoneal metastasis, spread to extra-abdominal organs – CT (chest, abdomen, pelvis) scan within 3 months prior to randomisation. 7. A WHO performance status 3 months. 13. No previous or concurrent malignancy diagnoses (except curatively-treated basal cell carcinoma of skin, carcinoma in situ of cervix). 14. No serious medical or psychological condition precluding adjuvant treatment. 15. Fully informed written consent given. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: 0 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 810 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 586

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or other concomitant chemotherapy. 2. Patients with pancreatic lymphoma. 3. Macroscopically remaining tumour (R2 resection). 4. Patients with TNM Stage IV disease. 5. Patients younger than 18 years. 6. Pregnancy. 7. New York Heart Association Classification Grade III or IV. 8. Previous chemotherapy. 9. All men or women of reproductive potential, unless using at least two contraceptive precautions, one of which must be a condom. 10. Patients with known malabsorption. 11. Patients with neutrophil counts of <1.5 x 10^9/l. 12. Patients with thrombocyte counts of <100 x 10^9/l. 13. Patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To investigate if combination chemotherapy (gemcitabine and capecitabine), when used as adjuvant therapy in patients following resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or peri-ampullary carcinoma, improves survival over adjuvant therapy using gemcitabine alone.;Secondary Objective: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients: 1. To compare the proportion of grade 3/4 toxicity across the treatment types. 2. To assess Quality of Life over time and treatment groups using the EORTC-C30 questionnaire. 3. To investigate and compare two year survival rates for the treatments. 4. To investigate and compare five year survival rates for the treatments. 5. To assess and compare relapse free survival (RFS). Peri-ampullary carcinoma patients: 1. To compare the proportion of grade 3/4 toxicity across the treatment types. 2. To assess Quality of Life over time and treatment groups using the EORTC-C30 questionnaire. 3. To investigate and compare four year survival rates for the treatments. 4. To assess and compare relapse free survival (RFS).;Primary end point(s): Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients and peri-ampullary carcinoma patients: Length of survival. This measure is length of survival defined as number of days between date of randomisation and date of death due to any cause (event) or date of last follow-up if patient is still alive at time of analysis (censored).;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients: Two years and five years after the last patient has been recruited. Peri-ampullary carcinoma patients: Four years after the last patient has been recruited.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients: 1. Toxicity 2. Quality of life 3. Two year survival 4. Five year survival 5. Relapse free survival (RFS) Peri-ampullary carcinoma patients: 1. Toxicity 2. Quality of life 3. Four year survival 4. Relapse free survival (RFS);Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients: Two years and five years after the last patient has been recruited. Peri-ampullary carcinoma patients: Four years after the last patient has been recruited.

Countries

Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Sweden, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Seema Chauhan

Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit

chauhans@liverpool.ac.uk440151794 8938

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026