Skip to content

Oral Contrast Agent for Elective Abdominopelvic CT: Water versus Dilute Gastrografin

Oral Contrast Agent for Elective Abdominopelvic CT: Water versus Dilute Gastrografin

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2007-003327-21-GB
Enrollment
200
Registered
2007-08-01
Start date
2007-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

No specific medical condition to be investigated. The trial is to look at physical and radiological characteristic of contrast agent and how it improves interpretation of CT scan.

Interventions

Trade Name: Gastrografin Pharmaceutical Form: Oral solution

Sponsors

Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust Radiology Department
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients referred for elective abdominopelvic CT examination over the study period. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients referred for CT of the oesophagus,stomach and pancreas (national guidelines suggest they should have oral water anyway) 2. Trauma patients referred from A/E: We use water anyway as using gastrograffin is more time consuming, hides mucosal detail, poor transit due to ileus, interferes with intervention etc 3. Specialist CT examination like CT Angiography, CT Enterography, CT Cholangiography, CT Colonography and CT Urography as positive contrast interferes with reconstructions. 4. Patients with acute abdomen - mucosal information is paramount - hence water used anyway 5. Children - water is usual preferred agent anyway

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Our aim is to assess the suitability of water as an oral contrast agent for routine or elective abdomino-pelvic examination compared to the more established positive oral contrast , dilute gastrograffin.;Secondary Objective: To assess patient acceptability of the two regimens and to assess cost implications of the two regimens;Primary end point(s): When the study period ends or when the required number of subjects achieved, whichever earlier.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026