Skip to content

Intra-individual, randomized comparison of the MRI contrast agents Gadovist® 1.0 versus Prohance® in patients with primary and secondary brain tumors, evaluated in a blinded read

Intra-individual, randomized comparison of the MRI contrast agents Gadovist® 1.0 versus Prohance® in patients with primary and secondary brain tumors, evaluated in a blinded read

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2007-002888-27-DE
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2008-07-08
Start date
2007-10-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary and secondary brain tumors

Interventions

Sponsors

Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Patients (> 18 yrs) with known CNS lesion(s) indicated for contrast enhanced MRI for diagnosis and are scheduled for neurosurgical treatment • Patients who are willing to undergo study procedures • Patients who are willing and able to sign informed consent Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Patients who have previously entered this study • Patients who are or are suspected in pregnancy or nursery • Patients with any physical or mental status that interferes with the signing of informed consent • Patients with a contraindication for MRI • Patients who have received any contrast material in 12 hours prior to injection with study or comparator drug in combination with moderate or severe renal impairment. • Patients who require emergency treatment • Patients with severely impaired hepatic or renal functions (e.g. SGPT ? 2 times the upper limit of reference range, acute renal failure) • Patients with underlying disease or concomitant medication which may interfere with efficacy evaluation • Patients who are scheduled for CNS surgery or who would have a biopsy prior to the second planned injection of contrast medium • Patients with known anaphylactoid or anaphylactic reaction to any contrast media

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The objective of this study is to prove, that Gadovist® 1.0 provides superior contrast enhancement characteristics of primary and secondary brain tumors as compared to ProHance®, thereby providing superior information for further diagnostic and/ or therapeutic decisions;Secondary Objective: ;Primary end point(s): Overall assessment of contrast enhancement on a three-point scale (better, equal, worse) in a matched-pairs assessment from MR imaging examinations of all post-contrast T1-weighted images

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026