Skip to content

A multicenter, randomized, parallel patients’ group, comparative clinical trial for the assessement of efficacy and safety of Pelethrocin®/HELP 500 mg (generic diosmin & hesperidin MPFF) versus Daflon®/Servier 500 mg (original diosmin & hesperidin MPFF) in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency patients (a therapeutic equivalence trial).

A multicenter, randomized, parallel patients’ group, comparative clinical trial for the assessement of efficacy and safety of Pelethrocin®/HELP 500 mg (generic diosmin & hesperidin MPFF) versus Daflon®/Servier 500 mg (original diosmin & hesperidin MPFF) in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency patients (a therapeutic equivalence trial).

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2007-001947-23-GR
Enrollment
136
Registered
2007-06-21
Start date
2007-11-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Venous Insufficiency MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10066682 Term: Chronic venous insufficiency

Interventions

Trade Name: Pelethrocin Product Name: Pelethrocin Pharmaceutical Form: Coated tablet INN or Proposed INN: DIOSMIN CAS Number: 520274 Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration type: equal Conc

Sponsors

HELP Pharmaceuticals S.A.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1- Patients who are able to read and comprehend the informed consent form 2- Patients who have signed the informed consent form 3- Patients diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency of medium to serious stage (class C3+ according to CEAP), to whom diagnosis of the condition has been confirmed with the help of subjective methodology. Patients to be included must have AVP > 60mm Hg, at both lower limbs, whereas RT time should be =65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1- Patients who have participated earlier (< 1 month) in another clinical trial of MPFF of combination of diosmine and esperidine 2- Patients who are taking prohibited recent or synchronious pharmaceutical prescription, meaning: metronidazol, CNS repressive medication, any diuretic preparation in the time span of last two weeks before the start of the trial. 3- Patients with other heart condition, neoplasmatic condition, diabetes and bone and junctures disorders. 4- Patients with ultrasound presence of recent (<12 months) venous thrombosis and/or medical history of suspicious venous thrombosis in the time span of the past 24 months. 5- Patients with medical history of serious allergy or hypersensitivity to preparation, or known hypersensitivity to the components of the study medication. 6- Female patients who are pregnant or are lactating. 7- Female patients with the ability to procreate and who are not using adequate contraception 8- Patients who, in the investigator’s opinion, are unlikely to comply with the clinical study protocol , or who are not appropriate for any other reasons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Primary study target is to investigate for any possible differences in efficacy and safety paremetrs between a generic version of MPFF diosmin & hesperidin (Pelethrocin®/HELP) and the original MPFF diosmin & hesperidin formulation marketed in Greece (Daflon®/Servier), in patients with chronic venous insufficiency (moderate & severe stages according to CEAP (Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical & Pathophysiological) classification).;Secondary Objective: Secondary objectives are: 1-to investigate possible variations in the presented time for the improvement of symptoms and signs of the condition between generic and original versions of the combination of diosmin & hesperidin. 2-to investigate for potential differences in the quality of life between generic and original versions of the combination of diosmin & hesperidin. 3-to investigate for potential differences in the safety between generic and original versions of the combination of diosmin & hesperidin. ;Primary end point(s): Primary end point is to investigate for any possible differences in efficacy between a generic version of MPFF diosmin & hesperidin (Pelethrocin®/HELP) and the original MPFF diosmin & hesperidin formulation marketed in Greece (Daflon®/Servier), in patients with chronic venous insufficiency (moderate & severe stages according to CEAP (Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical & Pathophysiological) classification).

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026