Skip to content

Non-inferiority study; Comparison of polyethylene glycol solution with and without electrolytes for treatment of chronic constipation in elderly institutionalised patients: a double-blind, randomised, parallelgroup, multicentre study - Pegorion

Non-inferiority study; Comparison of polyethylene glycol solution with and without electrolytes for treatment of chronic constipation in elderly institutionalised patients: a double-blind, randomised, parallelgroup, multicentre study - Pegorion

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2007-001676-36-FI
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2007-10-04
Start date
2007-12-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Constipation MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10010774 Term: Constipation

Interventions

Trade Name: Pegorion Pharmaceutical Form: Oral solution CAS Number: 8000014439 Other descriptive name: MACROGOL 4000 Trade Name: Colonsoft Pharmaceutical Form: Oral solution CAS Number: 7447407 Other

Sponsors

ORION PHARMA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Written informed consent obtained 2. Isotonic PEG treatment for constipation at a stable dose with no other medication used for constipation (except plantago ovata seeds) for at least 2 weeks before the run-in period. 3. Stool frequency at least 3 per week during the last 2 weeks before the run-in period 4. Having been institutionalised for at least 4 weeks and likely to be institutionalised for the duration of the study 5. Age 65 years or above Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) no F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Severe dementia 2. Acute gastrointestinal obstruction, gastric retention or perforation 3. Toxic or active colitis 4. Allergy to PEG 5. Lack of co-operation due a psychiatric illness 6. Acute disease according to the investigator’s judgment 7. Current or recent (1 month) participation in another clinical drug study 8. Other medical treatment of constipation than laxatives containing isotonic PEG or plantago ovata seeds

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The primary objective of the study is to show non-inferiority of hypotonic PEG product to isotonic PEG product in efficacy in elderly institutionalised patients. The other main objective is to demonstrate that hypotonic PEG product is safe and well tolerated.;Secondary Objective: Secondary objective is to compare the taste and willingness to use either hypotonic or isotonic PEG products. This will be done by interviewing the study subjects at the end of the study and by giving them the opportunity to compare the products.;Primary end point(s): To show non-inferiority of hypotpnic PEG product to isotonic PEG product.

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026