Skip to content

A double blind, double dummy, randomised, multicentre, four arm parallel group study to assess the efficacy and safety of FlutiForm™ pMDI 250/10 µg (2 puffs bid) vs Fluticasone pMDI 250 µg (2 puffs bid) plus Formoterol pMDI 12 µg (2 puffs bid) administered concurrently in adult subjects with severe persistent, reversible asthma.

A double blind, double dummy, randomised, multicentre, four arm parallel group study to assess the efficacy and safety of FlutiForm™ pMDI 250/10 µg (2 puffs bid) vs Fluticasone pMDI 250 µg (2 puffs bid) plus Formoterol pMDI 12 µg (2 puffs bid) administered concurrently in adult subjects with severe persistent, reversible asthma.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2007-001633-34-HU
Enrollment
1120
Registered
2008-05-22
Start date
2008-06-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma bronchial MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10003555 Term: Asthma bronchial

Interventions

Product Name: FlutiForm pMDI 50/5 µg Pharmaceutical Form: Pressurised inhalation, suspension INN or Proposed INN: FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE CAS Number: 80474142 Concentration unit: µg microgram(s) Concen

Sponsors

Mundipharma Research Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Male or female subjects at least 18 years old. 2. Females less than one year post-menopausal must have a negative urine pregnancy test recorded at the screening visit prior to the first dose of study medication, be non-lactating, and willing to use adequate and highly effective methods of contraception throughout the study. A highly effective method of birth control is defined as those which result in a low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly such as sterilisation, implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some IUDs (Intrauterine Device, hormonal), sexual abstinence or vasectomised partner. 3. Known history of severe persistent, reversible asthma for = 6 months prior to the Screening Visit characterised by treatment with ICS at a dose of = 500µg fluticasone or equivalent. 4. Demonstrated a FEV1 of = 40% to = 80% for predicted normal values (Quanjer et al., 1993) during the Screening Visit (Visit 1) and Randomisation Visit (Visit 3) following appropriate withholding of asthma medications (if applicable). - No ß2-agonist use on day of screening. - No use of inhaled combination asthma therapy on day of screening. - Inhaled corticosteroids are allowed on day of screening. 5. Documented reversibility of = 15% in FEV1 in the screening phase. 6. Demonstrated satisfactory technique in the use of the study medication. 7. Willing and able to enter information in the electronic diary and attend all study visits. 8. Willing and able to substitute study medication for their pre study prescribed asthma medication for the duration of the study. 9. Written informed consent obtained. Inclusion criteria required following run-in: 10. Subject has used rescue medication for at least 3 days and also had either at least one night with sleep disturbance (i.e., sleep disturbance score of = 1) or at least 3 days with asthma symptoms (i.e., a symptom score of = 1) during the last 7 days of the run-in period. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Near fatal or life-threatening (including intubation) asthma within the past year. 2. Hospitalisation or an emergency visit for asthma within the 4 weeks before the Screening Visit. 3. Known history of systemic (injectable or oral) corticosteroid medication within 1 month of the Screening Visit. 4. Known history of omalizumab use within the past 6 months. 5. Current evidence or known history of any clinically significant disease or abnormality including uncontrolled coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or cardiac dysrhythmia. ‘Clinically significant’ is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would put the subject at risk through study participation, or which would affect the outcome of the study. 6. In the investigator’s opinion a clinically significant upper or lower respiratory infection within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit. 7. Significant, non-reversible, active pulmonary disease (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, tuberculosis). 8. Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-positive status. 9. Subject has a smoking history equivalent to “10 pack years” (i.e., at least 1 pack of 20 cigarettes /day for 10 years or 10 packs/day for 1 year, etc.). 10. Current smoking history within 12 months prior to the Screening Visit. 11. Current evidence or known history of alcohol and/or substance abuse within 12 months prior to the Screening Visit. 12. Subject has taken ß-blocking agents, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, astemizole (Hismanal), quinidine type antiarrhythmics, or potent CYP 3A4 inhibitors such as ketoconazole within the past week. 13. Current use of medications other than those allowed in the protocol that will have an effect on bronchospasm and/or pulmonary function. 14. Current evidence or known history of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to test medications or components. 15. Subject has received an investigational drug within 30 days of the Screening Visit (12 weeks if an oral or injectable steroid). 16. Subject is currently participating in a clinical study or has already received FLT3503 double-blind medication.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To show non-inferiority in the efficacy of FlutiForm pMDI 250/10 µg (2 puffs bid) vs Fluticasone pMDI 250 µg (2 puffs bid) plus Formoterol pMDI 12 µg (2 puffs bid) administered concurrently, based on the mean change in the pre morning dose value of forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) from baseline (end of run-in period) to the end of the 8 week treatment period. The co-primary endpoint of this study is: To show non-inferiority in the efficacy of FlutiForm pMDI 250/10 µg (2 puffs bid) vs Fluticasone pMDI 250 µg (2 puffs bid) plus Formoterol pMDI 12 µg (2 puffs bid) administered concurrently, based on the mean change from the pre morning dose FEV1 value at baseline (end of run-in period) to the 2 hour post morning dose FEV1 value at the end of the 8 week treatment period.;Secondary Objective: To show superiority in the efficacy of FlutiForm pMDI 250/10 µg (2 puffs bid) vs Fluticasone pMDI 250 µg (2 puffs bid) alone by means of 12 hour FEV1 AUC (in a subset of 47 subjects per treatment group). To show superiority of FlutiForm pMDI 250/10 µg (2 puffs bid) vs Fluticasone pMDI 250 µg (2 puffs bid) alone in mean change of the pre morning dose FEV1 value from baseline (end of run-in period) to the end of the 8 week treatment period. To show superiority of FlutiForm pMDI 250/10 µg (2 puffs bid) vs Fluticasone pMDI 250 µg (2 puffs bid) alone in mean change from the pre morning dose FEV1 value at baseline (end of run-in period) to the 2 hour post morning dose FEV1 value at the end of the 8 week treatment period. ;Primary end point(s): The primary efficacy variable will be the mean change in the pre morning dose FEV1 value from baseline (end of run-in period) to the end of the 8 week treatment period. The co-primary efficacy variable will be the mean change from the pre morning dose FEV1 value at baseline (end of run-in period) to the 2 hour post morning dose FEV1 value at the end of the 8 week treatment period. FEV1 will be recorded using a

Countries

Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026