Skip to content

Randomised controlled trial of Intravitreal Bevacizumab vs. conventional treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. - Randomised controlled trial of Intravitreal Bevacizumab vs. conventional treatment for proliferative

Randomised controlled trial of Intravitreal Bevacizumab vs. conventional treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. - Randomised controlled trial of Intravitreal Bevacizumab vs. conventional treatment for proliferative

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2007-000658-30-IE
Enrollment
20
Registered
2007-02-07
Start date
2007-03-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Interventions

Trade Name: Avastin (bevacizumab) Product Name: Avastin (bevacizumab) Pharmaceutical Form: Injection*

Sponsors

Royal Victoria Eye and Ear hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 20 patients with new onset, bilateral, high risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (DRS criteria) will be recruited. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Only eye Women of childbearing potential

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To assess the effectiveness of intravitreal bevacizumab in treating proliferative diabetic retinopathy when compared with conventional treatment. Primary outcomes: 1. Best corrected visual acuity at 6 months 2. Neovascularisation. 3. Need for panretinal photocoagulation. 4. Need for vitrectomy 5. Median deviation in visual fields at 6 months ;Secondary Objective: Secondary outcomes: Quality of life (VFQ 25 questionnaire). ;Primary end point(s): Primary outcomes: 1. Best corrected visual acuity at 6 months 2. Neovascularisation. 3. Need for panretinal photocoagulation. 4. Need for vitrectomy 5. Median deviation in visual fields at 6 months

Countries

Ireland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026