Skip to content

A comparison of the efficacy of 10% lidocaine solution and EMLA cream as local anaesthetic for the insertion of tympanic membrane ventilation tubes. - 10% lidocaine and EMLA cream as LA for insertion of grommets

A comparison of the efficacy of 10% lidocaine solution and EMLA cream as local anaesthetic for the insertion of tympanic membrane ventilation tubes. - 10% lidocaine and EMLA cream as LA for insertion of grommets

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2007-000166-21-GB
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2007-04-17
Start date
2007-06-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Grommet/ventilation tube insertion in adults with otitis media with effusion (glue ear). MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10024759 Term: Local anaesthetic

Interventions

Trade Name: EMLA cream 5% Product Name: EMLA Pharmaceutical Form: Cream Trade Name: Xylocaine Product Name: Xylocaine Pharmaceutical Form: Cutaneous spray, solution

Sponsors

Whipps Cross University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: English speaking patients - as many of our patients speak poor English; they must be able to understand the procedure and the trial to give informed consent. Aged 18 years or over - as paediatric patients usually require a general anaesthetic for ventilation tube insertion due to poor compliance with lying still. Bilateral otitis media with effusion requiring treatment with ventilation tubes. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Limited/no English - as will be unable to give informed consent. Under 18 years of age - unable to comply with lying still. Significant tympanic membrane (eardrum) retraction - ventilation tube insertion is more difficult and may well be more uncomfortable in these patients. Patients requiring examination of their post-nasal space - sometimes required to exclude other causes of OME, and if not performed in the outpatient setting would require general anaesthesia. Tympanic membrane perforation (hole in the eardrum) - would let the local anaesthetic through the eardrum and enter the middle ear with potential for unwanted adverse effects. Significant ear canal stenosis (narrowing) - makes insertion of ventilation tubes more difficult and therefore more uncomfortable for patient. Known allergy to lidocaine/EMLA components.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To establish the most effective and acceptable method of locally anaesthetising the tympanic membrane to allow insertion of ventilation tubes in an awake patient, by comparing 10% lidocaine solution with EMLA cream.;Secondary Objective: ;Primary end point(s): Insertion of ventilation tubes under local anaesthetic. Follow-up appontment after 3 weeks. Main outcome measure is patient discomfort, as assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026