Skip to content

AN INTERNATIONAL, OPEN, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY OF COMBINING PROPHYLACTIC CUROSURF WITH EARLY NASAL CPAP VERSUS EARLY NASAL CPAP ALONE IN VERY PRETERM INFANTS AT RISK OF RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME - CURPAP STUDY

AN INTERNATIONAL, OPEN, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY OF COMBINING PROPHYLACTIC CUROSURF WITH EARLY NASAL CPAP VERSUS EARLY NASAL CPAP ALONE IN VERY PRETERM INFANTS AT RISK OF RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME - CURPAP STUDY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2006-004105-25-CZ
Enrollment
208
Registered
2006-12-13
Start date
2007-02-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome MedDRA version: 8.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10028974 Term: Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

Interventions

Trade Name: Curosurf Product Name: Curosurf Pharmaceutical Form: Endotracheopulmonary instillation, suspension INN or Proposed INN: Poractant Alfa 1534 CHF CAS Number: 129069-19-8 Other descriptive n

Sponsors

Chiesi Farmaceutici S p A
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Preterm neonates will be randomized into the study via IVRS if the following inclusion criteria are met: 1. Preterm neonates with a GA (Gestational Age) of 25(+0) - 28(+6) completed weeks (see appendix II). 2. Inborn neonates. 3. In case of twins, both neonates will be included in the same treatment arm (for details see Section 6.2 "Treatment Assignment" of the Protocol). 4. Parental written informed consent for participation in the study obtained on admission to hospital or prior to delivery. Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) no F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Preterm neonates will not be randomized into the study if at least one of the following criteria is met: 1. Evidence of severe birth asphyxia or an APGAR score below 3 at 5 minutes of age. 2. Need for endotracheal intubation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation or insufficient respiratory drive. 3. Known genetic or chromosomal disorders. 4. Delivered to mothers with ruptured membranes of more than 3 weeks duration. 5. Potentially life-threatening conditions unrelated to immaturity. 6. Participation in another clinical trial of any placebo , drug, biological, or device conducted under the provisions of a protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The primary objective is a comparative evaluation of the two methods of post-delivery stabilization and subsequent early respiratory care to reduce the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) and related secondary complications, such as BPD (Bronchopulmonary dysplasia), in premature babies at high risk of RDS (Respiratory Distress Syndrome): 1. Early stabilization on nCPAP (nasal continuous positive airway pressure). 2. Intubation, prophylactic surfactant (Curosurf) administration shortly after delivery, and rapid extubation to nCPAP. The data obtained from this comparison will be applied to test the hypothesis that preterm neonates at risk of RDS who are treated with prophylactic surfactant + nCPAP show less need for MV when compared to infants who receive nCPAP alone.;Secondary Objective: The secondary objectives are to evaluate the safety and overall clinical outcome of infants randomized into the study until 36 weeks post menstrual age.;Primary end point(s): The primary endpoint is the incidence of the need for MV (mechanical ventilation) within the first 5 days of life.

Countries

Czech Republic, France, Italy, Portugal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026