Skip to content

Effect of continuous versus cyclic dosing regimen of hormonal contraception on bleeding pattern, cardivascular risk marker, sexual function and satisfaction

Effect of continuous versus cyclic dosing regimen of hormonal contraception on bleeding pattern, cardivascular risk marker, sexual function and satisfaction

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2006-003636-30-SE
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2008-01-28
Start date
2008-04-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The study aims to evaluate the bleeding pattern, side-effects, cardiovascular riskmarker, sexual function and user-satisfaction when combined contraceptive hormonal methods are being administered continuously without hormonfree intervals. The products to be studied are since long marketed and frequently used and studied during cyclic use MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10010808 Term: Contraception

Interventions

Trade Name: Yasmin Pharmaceutical Form: Tablet INN or Proposed INN: DROSPIRENONE CAS Number: 67392874 Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration type: equal Concentration number: 3- INN or Pro

Sponsors

Karolinska University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy fertile women between 18 and 45 years of age. Desire for a hormonal contraceptive method. Willing to participate in the study for 12 months Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any contraindication for estrogen containing treatment. Regular medication with non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To compare cardiovascular riskmarkers and side-effects between combined contraceptive hormonal methods administered cyclic (i.e 3 weeks followed by 7 days hormon-free interval) and continuous for 6 months;Secondary Objective: To compare sexual function and well-being between subjects using cyclic and continuous contraceptive methods;Primary end point(s): Are there any differences in the cardiovascular factors if estrogen and gestagen are administered during longer periods without hormon-free intervals? Could this mode of administration benefit users? How will the bleeding pattern change?

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026