Skip to content

Argatroban versus Lepirudin in Critically Ill Patients - ALiCia

Argatroban versus Lepirudin in Critically Ill Patients - ALiCia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2006-003122-28-DE
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2008-08-22
Start date
2008-12-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critically ill patients are usually treated with heparin for anticoagulation. A serious complication of heparin therapy is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT). Patients with HIT have to receive alternative anticoagulants. We propose to test the hypotheses that argatroban significantly increases efficacy and safety of renal replacement therapy as measured by life time of hemodialysis filters when compared to lepirudin in critically ill patients. MedDRA version: 8.1 Level: LLT Classi

Interventions

Trade Name: Argatra Pharmaceutical Form: Concentrate for solution for infusion Trade Name: Refludan Pharmaceutical Form: Powder for solution for infusion

Sponsors

Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult ICU patients (age =18 years) with thrombocytopenia suspicious for HIT with a decrease in platelet count by >50% from baseline and a 4 T´s score >3 (baseline defined as the highest value since start of heparin therapy)AND/OR positive inhouse HIT testing (ELISA). Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Age 60 sec. - History of adverse events or sensitivity against study drugs - Pregnancy - Preexisting psychiatric/neurologic disorders with long-term inability to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary end point(s): Primary endpoint will be the mean runtime of two consecutive haemodialysis circuits from start till clotting. ;Main Objective: Main objective of the trial is to compare the efficacy of anticoagulation with argatroban or refludan in critically ill patients with HIT undergoing renal replacement therapy. The primary study endpoint is the mean running time of the two consecutive haemodialysis circuits in patients undergoing haemodialysis. ;Secondary Objective: Secondary objectives are controlability of dosing regimens, safety issues, such as incidence of bleeding, transfusion requirements, and incidence of thrombo-embolic events (thrombosis, stroke, gangrene, ischemia and limb amputation secondary to HIT), anaphylactic reactions, SUARS (Suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions), length of hospital stay, mortality during hospitalization and time till target aPTT.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026