Skip to content

Use of mieloablative doses of zevalin in aggressive lymphomas of the elderly. Prospective randomized study Z-HDS1,2 vs R-CHOP - Z-HDS1,2 vs R-CHOP protocol

Use of mieloablative doses of zevalin in aggressive lymphomas of the elderly. Prospective randomized study Z-HDS1,2 vs R-CHOP - Z-HDS1,2 vs R-CHOP protocol

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2006-002524-42-IT
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2007-03-20
Start date
2006-09-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aggressive malignant lymphoma MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10012818 Term: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Interventions

Product Name: Doxorubicin Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection INN or Proposed INN: Doxorubicin CAS Number: 25316-40-9 Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration type: equal Concentrati

Sponsors

FONDAZIONE MICHELANGELO - AVANZAMENTO DELLO STUDIO E CURA DEI TUMORI
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Histologically confirmed diagnosis of DLBCL 2. Age 65 and older, or between 60 and 65 in the presence of contraindications to high dose myeloablative chemotherapy 3. Presence of 1 or more of the following factors high LDH levels, PS 2-4, stage III-IV, 1 extranodal involvement 4. CD20 positive lymphoma 5. DLCO 50 and ejection fraction 45 Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Histology other than the one described above 2. Severe concomitant or uncontrolled nonmalignant diseases 3. Presence of opportunistic infections or HIV positivity or HBsAg positivity 4. Previous or concomitant malignancies, except non-melanoma skin tumors and in situ carcinoma of the cervix 5. History of amafilaxis or serum allergic reactions 6. Unable to out-patient follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To compare the efficacy of a High Dose Sequential HDS chemotherapy plus Zevalin vs standard R-CHOP regimen;Secondary Objective: To assess hematological and non-hematological toxicity both acute and delayed;Primary end point(s): Disease-free survival at 12 months

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026