Skip to content

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Stratified, Standard-of-Care Controlled, Feasibility and Safety Study of rhBMP-2/CPM as an Adjuvant Therapy for Fractures of the Proximal Femur

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Stratified, Standard-of-Care Controlled, Feasibility and Safety Study of rhBMP-2/CPM as an Adjuvant Therapy for Fractures of the Proximal Femur

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2006-001832-34-GB
Enrollment
108
Registered
2006-09-29
Start date
2007-01-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Closed fracture of the proximal femur MedDRA version: 8.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10020100 Term: Hip fracture

Interventions

Product Name: DIBOTERMIN ALPHA(rhBMP-2)/CPM KIT Product Code: DIBOTERMIN ALPHA(rhBMP-2)/CPM KIT Pharmaceutical Form: Injection* INN or Proposed INN: DIB

Sponsors

Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Subject’s signed and dated informed consent form, approved by the institutional review board (IRB) or independent ethics committee (IEC). 2. Age =55 years. 3. Acute closed fracture of the proximal femur: displaced femoral neck fracture (Garden Type III or IV); basilar neck fracture (Orthopaedic Trauma Association [OTA] Classification 31-B2); or unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture (OTA Classification 31-A2 or 31-A3) 4. Anatomic reduction (open or closed) and internal fixation within 48 hours following injury using any one of the following fixation constructs: 1) multiple parallel interfragmentary screws; 2) sliding hip screw and side plate fixation; or 3) cephalomedullary nail. 5. Domestically independent (noninstitutionalized) and ambulatory (with or without walking aids) before injury. 6. Score =21 on Mini-Mental State Examination, indicating that subject is cognitively intact. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Concurrent fractures of the ipsilateral or contralateral lower extremity that would impede performance on functional assessments. 2. Previous arthroplasty of contralateral hip. 3. Planned procedure(s) to stimulate fracture healing after internal fixation of the fractured hip. 4. Documented history of heterotopic ossification. 5. Pathological fractures, except if due to postmenopausal or senile osteoporosis. 6. Treatment initiated for osteoporosis within the past 16 weeks. 7. Any previous use of therapies that can be considered bone anabolic (parathyroid hormone, growth hormone, anabolic steroids, or fluoride at bone therapeutic doses) within the past year. 8. History of other metabolic bone disorders that may affect the region under study (eg, Paget’s disease, renal osteodystrophy, or benign tumor). 9. Documented history of malignancy, except basal or squamous cell carcinoma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To demonstrate the safety of administering rhBMP-2/CPM (either 1.0 mg/mL or 2.0 mg/mL) as an adjunct to internal fixation in subjects with fractures of the proximal femur. The key safety outcome is the incidence of secondary fracture displacement among subjects treated with rhBMP-2/CPM and those receiving standard surgical treatment (internal fixation) alone. ; Secondary Objective: To establish a satisfactory method of administering rhBMP-2/CPM to implement in a phase 3 efficacy trial in this clinical indication· To estimate the success and failure rates associated with key fracture outcomes ;Primary end point(s): The efficacy data for the trial stem from clinical, radiographic, and functional assesments aimed at evaluating the key fracture outcomes of fracture healing and restoration of functional mobility. Fracture healing is determined from a combined set of clinical and radiographic criteria: absence of pain with full weight bearing and presence of radiographic fracture union. Restauration of functional mobility is assessesd by subjects' performance on the timed up and go (TUG) test, a validated method closely associated with subjects' level of independence in basic mobility

Countries

Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Sweden, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026