Skip to content

REVISION HP REPLACEMENT - ACETABULAR IMPACTION GRAFTING - A RADIOSTEREOMETRIC COMPARISON BETWEEN FRESH FROZEN ALLOGRAFT AND MARROW-DEPLETED BONE WITH CALCIUM PHOSPHATE PLUS OR MINUS BONE MORPHOGENIC PROTEIN. - ACETABULAR BONE GRAFTING SUBSTITUTES IN REVISION HIP SURGERY

REVISION HP REPLACEMENT - ACETABULAR IMPACTION GRAFTING - A RADIOSTEREOMETRIC COMPARISON BETWEEN FRESH FROZEN ALLOGRAFT AND MARROW-DEPLETED BONE WITH CALCIUM PHOSPHATE PLUS OR MINUS BONE MORPHOGENIC PROTEIN. - ACETABULAR BONE GRAFTING SUBSTITUTES IN REVISION HIP SURGERY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2006-001725-25-GB
Enrollment
66
Registered
2007-07-26
Start date
2007-08-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

REVISION HIP REPLACEMENT MedDRA version: 9.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10057128 Term: Revision of hip arthroplasty

Interventions

Trade Name: OSIGRAFT Pharmaceutical Form: Powder for suspension for injection INN or Proposed INN: EPTOTERMIN ALFA Other descriptive name: OSIGRAFT Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration t

Sponsors

GREATER GLASGOW HEALTH BOARD
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 REQUIRE REVISION HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY WITH A LOOSE ACETABULAR COMPONENT AND BONE DEFICIENCY VISIBLE ON X-RAY. 2 REQUIRE BONE GRAFTING AS PART OF THE REVISION HIP REPLACEMENT OPERATION. 3 LIKELY TO BE ABLE TO WEIGHT BEAR AND WALK IN THE IMMEDIATE POST OPERATIVE PHASE. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 PATIENTS WHO DO NOT AGREE TO CONSENT 2 PATIENTS WHO RE UNABLE TO WEIGHT BEAR POST OP. ( EG RELATED TO THE NATURE OF ANY FEMORAL REVISION ) 3 PATIENTS IN WHOM OSIGRAFT IS CONTRAINDICATED AS PER THE MANUFACTURERS GUIDELINES

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: DURING REVISION HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY OPERATIONS IT IS COMMON PRACTICE TO USE BONE GRAFT (FRESH FROZEN ALLOGRAFT - DONATED BY OTHER PATIENTS HAVING HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY ) TO BUILD UP DEFECTS IN THE HIP SOCKET IN ORDER TO PROVIDE GOOD SUPPORT FOR THE NEW INPLANT. WE WISH TO DETERMINE IF MATERIAL OTHER THAN FRESH FROZEN ALLOGRAFT BONE WILL PROVIDE SIMILAR LEVELS OF SUPPORT. WE PLAN TO COMPARE FRESH FROZEN ALLOGRAFT BONE TO A MIXTURE OF MARROW - DEPLETED BONE ( ALSO DONATED BY OTHER PATIENTS HAVING HIP REPLACEMENTS BUT PREPARED BY THE SCOTTISH BLOOD TRANSFUSION SERVICES BONE BANK IN A DIFFERENT MANNER ) AND A SYNTHETIC BONE SUBSTITUTE ( BONESAVE - CALCIUM PHOSPHATE GRANULES ) PLUS OR MINUS A BONE MORPHOGENIC PROTEIN ( OSIGRAFT - A PROTEIN WHICH INDUCES NEW BONE FORMATION ).;Secondary Objective: NONE;Primary end point(s): RADIOSTEREOMETRIC X-RAYS WILL BE TAKEN OF THE HIP REPLACEMENTS AT 2-3 DAYS, 3 MTHS, 6 MTHS, 1 YR AND 2 YRS POST OPERATIVELY.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026