Skip to content

Pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell, in patients with hematologic and solid tumors a randomized phase II study - ND

Pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell, in patients with hematologic and solid tumors a randomized phase II study - ND

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2006-001409-27-IT
Enrollment
80
Registered
2006-10-05
Start date
2006-06-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with hematological neoplasia or solid tumors treated with high-dose chemotherapy MedDRA version: 6.1 Level: HLGT Classification code 10027655

Interventions

Product Name: filgrastim Pharmaceutical Form: Concentrate for solution for injection INN or Proposed INN: Filgrastim CAS Number: 121181-53-1 Concentration unit: µg microgram(s) Concentration type: equ

Sponsors

ISTITUTO CLINICO HUMANITAS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 61619; 18 years Normal cardiac, hepatic renal and lung function Patients with hematological neoplasia or solid tumor treated with High-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral stem cell reinfusion The CD34 number must be at least 3 x106/kg Written consent signed by the patient Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Use concomitantly of experimental drugs Psicological, social condition which can hinder the study compliance Active infection at time of high-dose chemotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of pegfilgrastim compared to filgrastim;Secondary Objective: Evaluation of immunological reconstitution after peg filgrastim and filgrastim;Primary end point(s): To demonstrate the non-inferiority of pegfilgrastim compared to filgrastim

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026