Skip to content

A Randomised Phase 3 Trial of Alimta (pemetrexed) and Carboplatin versus Etoposide and Carboplatin in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

A Randomised Phase 3 Trial of Alimta (pemetrexed) and Carboplatin versus Etoposide and Carboplatin in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2006-001173-14-BE
Enrollment
1820
Registered
2006-05-30
Start date
2006-07-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Extensive stage Disease Small cell Lung cancer

Interventions

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company Limited
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients are eligible to be included in the study only if they meet all of the following criteria: [1] Histological or cytological diagnosis of ED-SCLC, including malignant pleural effusion (see Protocol Attachment JMHO.4 Staging of Small Cell Carcinoma of Lung). [2] Performance status of 0 to 2 on the ECOG performance status schedule (Oken et al. 1982). (See Protocol Attachment JMHO.3) [3] No prior systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or biological therapy for SCLC. [4] Prior radiation therapy allowed to =65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients will be excluded from the study if they meet any of the following criteria: [12] Have received treatment within the last 30 days with a drug that has not received regulatory approval for any indication at the time of study entry. [13] Have previously participated in a study involving pemetrexed. [14] Have a mixed histological diagnosis of SCLC and NSCLC. [15] Have a serious concomitant systemic disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the patient’s ability to adhere to the protocol. [16] Have an active infection (=38.5ºC and/or receiving intravenous antibiotic therapy). [17] Have a serious cardiac condition, such as myocardial infarction within 6 months, angina, or heart disease as defined by the New York Heart Association Class III or IV (Protocol Attachment JMHO.8). [18] Have had recent (within 30 days of study treatment) or concurrent yellow fever vaccination. [19] Have had a prior malignancy other than SCLC, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or nonmelanoma skin cancer, unless that prior malignancy was diagnosed and definitively treated at least 5 years previously with no subsequent evidence of recurrence. Patients with a history of low grade (Gleason score =6) localized prostate cancer will be eligible even if diagnosed less than 5 years previously. [20] Symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases and asymptomatic CNS metastases requiring concurrent corticosteroid therapy. Treated stable CNS metastases are allowed; the patient must be stable after radiotherapy for =2 weeks and off of corticosteroids for =1 week. [21] Presence of clinically significant third-space fluid collections, for example, ascites or pleural effusions that cannot be controlled by drainage or other procedures prior to study entry. [22] Significant weight loss (that is, =10%) over the 6 week period prior to study entry. [23] Concurrent administration of any other antitumor therapy. [24] Inability to interrupt aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, other than an aspirin dose =1.3 grams per day, for a 5-day period (8-day period for long-acting agents, such as piroxicam). [25] Inability or unwillingness to take folic acid or vitamin B12 supplementation. [26] Inability to take corticosteroids.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The primary objective of the study is to compare the overall survival of previously untreated patients with ED-SCLC after treatment with pemetrexed plus carboplatin versus etoposide plus carboplatin.;Secondary Objective: The secondary objectives of the study are to assess and compare the following variables between treatment arms: • overall survival among a subgroup of patients classified as “sensitive” with respect to the results of a prospectively defined set of biomolecular assays • time-to-event variables, including: o objective progression-free survival (PFS) o survival without Grade 4 toxicity (G4 SWT) o survival without Grade 3-4 toxicity (G3-4 SWT) o time to worsening of HRQoL (health-related quality of life) (TWQ) • objective tumor response • time-to-event variables and objective tumor response among the subgroup of patients classified as “sensitive” with respect to the results of a prospectively defined set of biomolecular assays • changes in dimensions of HRQoL • the safety and adverse event profile (including Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE Version 3.0, NCI 2003] grades for laboratory and nonlaboratory adverse events) ;Primary end point(s): The primary endpoint of this study is to compare pemetrexed plus carboplatin with etoposide plus carboplatin in terms of overall survival (OS) of previously untreated patients with ED-SCLC

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026