Skip to content

INTRAINDIVIDUAL CROSS-OVER STUDY TO COMPARE MULTIHANCE® AND MAGNEVIST® AT A DOSE OF 0.1 MMOL/KGBW IN CERVICO-CEREBRAL MR ANGIOGRAPHY AND CEREBRAL MR PERFUSION IMAGING AT 3 TESLA IN PATIENTS WITH CAROTID ARTERY STENOSIS

INTRAINDIVIDUAL CROSS-OVER STUDY TO COMPARE MULTIHANCE® AND MAGNEVIST® AT A DOSE OF 0.1 MMOL/KGBW IN CERVICO-CEREBRAL MR ANGIOGRAPHY AND CEREBRAL MR PERFUSION IMAGING AT 3 TESLA IN PATIENTS WITH CAROTID ARTERY STENOSIS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2006-000929-59-DE
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2006-11-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carotid artery stenosis and scheduled for MRA, for MR perfusion examination and for an elective stent treatment MedDRA version: 8.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10007687 Term: Carotid artery stenosis

Interventions

Sponsors

Bracco ALTANA Pharma GmbH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patient suffers from a stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA), is scheduled for MRA, for MR perfusion examination and for an elective stent treatment; 2. Patient is adult (age, > or =18 years), conscious and co-operative; 3. Patient provides written Informed Consent to participate in the study. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient has a body weight > or = 100 kg; 2. Patients with a severe heart failure (NYHA class IV); 3. Patients with renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance 60 %) of the contralateral carotid artery; 5. Intra-vascular MR contrast agent procedure within 36 hours preceding each study MR examination; 6. Patient with a history of hypersensitivity to any metals or to chelates of Gadolinium; 7. Significant allergic disposition; 8. Patient with pacemakers, ferro-magnetic material such as surgical clips or any other conditions that would preclude proximity to a strong magnetic field; 9. Patient is suffering from severe claustrophobia; 10. Patient with any medical condition or other circumstances that would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data or of achieving the study objectives, i.e.: - drug dependence, - psychiatric disorder, dementia, or other reasons for expected poor compliance with investigator’s instructions, - medical conditions, associated illness, or extenuating circumstances that make it highly unlikely that the patient can complete the study; 11. Patient is female and pregnant or nursing; 12. Patient is female and the possibility of pregnancy cannot be excluded from one of the following points: - surgical sterilization (method has to be recorded on medical history form), - confirmed post-menopausal (with minimum 1-year history without menstruation), - negative pregnancy test (confirmed via ß-HCG measurement); 13. Patient is currently participating or has previously participated in a study (in which an investigational drug was dispensed) within 30 days prior to admission to this study; 14. Patient has previously entered this study; 15. Patient without legal capacity (i.e. prisoners).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To show the superiority of MultiHance® over Magnevist® in the quality of vascular delineation of supraaortic vessels in 3T CE-MRA. ;Primary end point(s): The individual mean of vessel delineation scores over all evaluable arterial segments (scores 1-5) of a patient as determined in on-site separate assessments of MRA.;Secondary Objective: To compare the contrasting behavior of MultiHance® and Magnevist®: · in 3T CE-MRA with regard to: - Image quality; - Signal intensity measurements; - Determination of the grade and length of the target stenosis (in comparison with DSA results) · in 3T MR perfusion imaging with regard to: - Perfusion quantitative parameters. To compare DSA and 3T CE-MRA (accuracy analysis) in terms of: - Grade of the target stenosis; - Detection/grade of additional stenoses of cerebral arteries. To compare MRI findings pre- and post stent implantation: - Change (normalization) in perfusion deficits; - Delineation of cerebral arteries.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026