Skip to content

A Randomized Prospective Study of Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Graft vs. Inductos™

A Randomized Prospective Study of Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Graft vs. Inductos™

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2005-005766-36-BE
Enrollment
40
Registered
2006-10-23
Start date
2006-11-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

We will investigate if the use of Inductos in a intervertebral cage will provide us with better and or faster fusion rates.

Interventions

Trade Name: Inductos Product Name: Inductos Pharmaceutical Form: Impregnated pad

Sponsors

Sofamor - Danek
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Skeletally mature to 70 years of age. Subject is indicated for posterior fusion at one, two, or three levels from L1 to S1. Subject has a one or more of the following diagnoses supported by MRI, and/or CT Scan, and/or Plain X-rays, and/or Discography and physical examination performed by the Investigator : Degenerative Disc Disease Internal Disc Disruption Spinal Stenosis Herniated Nucleus Pulposus Spondylolisthesis (Isthmic-Lytic or Degenerative) Grade I or Grade II only Spondylolysis Failed Lumbar Laminectomy Syndrome Subject has no prior fusion attempts in the lumbar spine. Has experienced pain with or without functional deficit and/or neurologic deficit for a minimum three month period of time prior to surgery. Has failed to respond to non-operative treatment modalities for minimum three month period of time prior to surgery. Has normal bleeding parameters. Subject signs the approved Informed Consent Form. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant at time of surgery or plans to become pregnant within 2 years following surgery. Number of levels to be fused are greater than 3. Subject has a lumbar spine deformity, i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis, flat back, ankylosing spondylitis Will not be available or will not make self available for follow-up visits in accordance with the protocol to at least 24 months. Currently implanted with a posterior instrumentation system. Mentally incompetent or prisoner. Subject is being treated with investigational devices for the same disorder. Active localized or systemic infection. Past spinal infection. Presence of disease entity or condition which precludes the possibility of bony fusion (i.e. metastatic cancer, long-term use of steroids, etc..). Is unable to undergo autologous grafting procedure (due to insufficient bone stock, osteopenia, or for other reasons). Has an immunosuppressive disorder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Is there a faster and higher fusion ratio in a group of patients in which the intervetebral cage is filled with Inductos in comparison with patients where the cage is filled up with autologous bone graft.;Secondary Objective: ;Primary end point(s): Two years after surgery, through clinical, anamnestic and radiological investigation

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026