Skip to content

RECORD 2 Study: REgulation of Coagulation in ORthopedic Surgery to prevent DVT and PE, controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Study of BAY59-7939 in the Extended Prevention of VTE in Patients Undergoing Elective Total Hip Replacement - Record 2

RECORD 2 Study: REgulation of Coagulation in ORthopedic Surgery to prevent DVT and PE, controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Study of BAY59-7939 in the Extended Prevention of VTE in Patients Undergoing Elective Total Hip Replacement - Record 2

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2005-004691-20-GB
Enrollment
2500
Registered
2005-12-01
Start date
2006-01-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prevention of venous thromboembolism MedDRA version: 8.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10012108 Term: Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis

Interventions

Product Name: BAY 59-7939 Product Code: BAY 59-7939 Pharmaceutical Form: Film-coated tablet INN or Proposed INN: Rivaroxaban CAS Number:

Sponsors

Bayer HealthCare AG
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Male and female patients aged 18 years or above. Patients scheduled for elective total hip replacement. Patients’ written informed consent for participation after receiving detailed written and oral information prior to any study specific procedures. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Planned, staged bilateral total hip replacement 2. Active bleeding or high risk of bleeding contraindicating treatment with low molecular weight heparin. 3. Contraindication listed in the labeling or conditions precluding patient treatment with enoxaparin or requiring dose adjustment (e.g. severe renal impairment, please refer to the local labelling of enoxaparin). 4. Significant liver disease (e.g. acute clinical hepatitis, chronic active hepatitis, cirrhosis) 5. Conditions prohibiting bilateral veno graphy (amputation of one leg, allergy to contrast media). 6. Pregnant and breast-feeding women. Women with child-bearing potential not using adequate birth control method. (Note: as adequate method of birth control oral contraception is recommended. If oral contraception is not feasible both partners should use adequate barrier birth control). 7. Drug- or alcohol abuse. 8. Concomitant HIV-protease inhibitors. 9. Therapy with another investigational product within 30 days prior start of study. 10. Planned intermittent pneumatic compression during active treatment period. 11. Concomitant participation in another trial or study. 12. Other concomitant medications not allowed (see § 4.5.7 of the study protocol) 13. Ongoing oral anticoagulant therapy that cannot be stopped in the opinion of the investigator. (see § 4.5.7 of the study protocol)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The objective of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of VTE prophylaxis with BAY 59-7939 10 mg once daily administered for 5 weeks to enoxaparin 40 mg once daily (qd) administered for 10-14 days followed by placebo in men and women aged 18 years or above undergoing elective total hip replacement. ;Secondary Objective: ; Primary end point(s): The primary efficacy endpoint is defined as a composite endpoint of: - Any DVT (proximal and/or distal) and - Non fatal PE and - Death from all causes. The analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint will be solely based on the assessments made by the Venography and the VTE Adjudication Committees. Secondary efficacy endpoints are: - Incidence of the composite endpoint comprising proximal DVT, non-fatal PE and VTE-related death (referred to as ‘major VTE’) Further secondary endpoints are given by: - Incidence of DVT (total, proximal, distal) -Incidence of symptomatic VTE (DVT, PE) - Incidence of symptomatic VTE during follow-up (i.e. after the end of the time window for primary efficacy assessment) - 'Net clinical benefit' assessed by the composite endpoint comprising major VTE and treatment-emergent major bleeding (as defined in section 4.6.2 of protocol) - Incidence of the composite endpoint that results from the primary endpoint by substituting VTE related death for all death (composite of any DVT and nonfatal PE and VTE-related death) - Incidence of the composite endpoint that results from major VTE by substituting all cause mortality for VTE related death (composite of proximal DVT and nonfatal PE and death from all caus

Countries

Denmark, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Sweden, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026