Skip to content

RECORD 3 Study: REgulation of Coagulation in ORthopedic Surgery to Prevent DVT and PE; controlled, double-blind, randomized study of BAY 59-7939 in the prevention of VTE in subjects undergoing elective total knee replacement - RECORD 3

RECORD 3 Study: REgulation of Coagulation in ORthopedic Surgery to Prevent DVT and PE; controlled, double-blind, randomized study of BAY 59-7939 in the prevention of VTE in subjects undergoing elective total knee replacement - RECORD 3

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2005-004620-40-SE
Enrollment
2300
Registered
2005-12-05
Start date
2006-01-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prevention of venous thromboembolism MedDRA version: 8.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10012108

Interventions

Sponsors

Bayer HealthCare AG
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: •Male and female patients aged 18 years or above •Subjects scheduled for elective total knee replacement •Subjects' written informed consent for participation after receiving detailed written and oral information prior to any study specific procedures Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: •Active bleeding or high risk of bleeding contraindicating treatment with low molecular weight heparin •Contraindication listed in the labeling or conditions precluding patient treatment with enoxaparin or requiring dose adjustment (eg, severe renal impairment, please refer to the local label of enoxaparin in your country) •Conditions prohibiting bilateral venography (eg, amputation of one leg, allergy to contrast media) •Pregnant and breast-feeding women. Women with child-bearing potential not using adequate birth control method. (Note: as adequate method of birth control oral contraception is recommended. If oral contraception is not feasible both partners should use adequate barrier birth control). •Drug- or alcohol abuse •Concomitant HIV-protease inhibitors •Significant liver disease (eg, acute clinical hepatitis, chronic active hepatitis, cirrhosis) •Therapy with another investigational product within 30 days prior to start of study •Planned intermittent pneumatic compression during active treatment period •Concomitant participation in another trial or study •Other concomitant medications not allowed (see Section 4.5.7 of the protocol) •Subjects for whom therapy with anticoagulants cannot be stopped in the opinion of the investigator/physician (eg, phenprocoumon, warfarin-sodium, heparins, and Factor Xa inhibitors other than study medication)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The objective is to assess the efficacy and safety of BAY 59-7939 10 mg once daily dosing in prevention of VTE in men and women aged 18 years or above undergoing elective total knee replacement.;Secondary Objective: A further study endpoint is health care resource utilization, assessed by duration of hospitalization, any re-hospitalization during the entire study period, and rehabilitation center stay following hospital discharge.;Primary end point(s): The primary efficacy endpoint is defined as a composite endpoint of: •Any DVT (proximal and/or distal) and •Non fatal PE and •Death from all causes. The analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint will be solely based on the assessments made by the ICAC and the AC/VTE. The major secondary efficacy endpoint is: •Incidence of the composite endpoint comprising proximal DVT, non-fatal PE and VTE-related death (referred to as ‘major VTE’) Further secondary endpoints are given by: •Incidence of DVT (total, proximal, distal) •Incidence of symptomatic VTE (DVT, PE) •Incidence of symptomatic VTE during follow-up (i.e. after the end of the time window for primary efficacy assessment). •'Net clinical benefit' assessed by the composite endpoint compromising major VTE and treatment-emergent major bleeding (as defined in Section 4.6.2) •Incidence of the composite endpoint that results from the primary endpoint by substituting VTE related death for all death (composite of any DVT [proximal and/or distal] and nonfatal PE and VTE-related death) •Incidence of the composite endpoint that results from major VTE by substituting all cause mortality for VTE-related death (composite of proximal DVT and nonfatal PE and death from all causes) The analysis of the secondary efficacy endpoints related to VTE will be solely based on the assessments made by the ICAC and AC/VTE.

Countries

Belgium, Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Norway, Spain, Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026