Skip to content

Prevention of one sort of cerebral vascular stroke (small subcortical strokes) in patients who already suffered one before

Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes - SPS3

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2005-003242-34-ES
Enrollment
2500
Registered
2012-09-11
Start date
2005-11-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Secondary prevention of small subcortical strokes MedDRA version: 15.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10063751 Term: Ministroke System Organ Class: 10029205 - Nervous system disorders

Interventions

Trade Name: PLAVIX 75 mg comprimidos recubiertos con película Pharmaceutical Form: Coated tablet INN or Proposed INN: CLOPIDOGREL Other descriptive name: CLOPIDOGREL Concentration unit: mg milligram(s

Sponsors

National Institutes of Neurological Disorders: Stroke
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: One of the following lacunar stroke clinical syndromes (adapted from Fisher) lasting > 24 hrs: a. Pure motor hemiparesis (PMH) b. Pure sensory stroke c. Sensorimotor stroke d. Ataxic hemiparesis e. Dysarthria-clumsy hand syndrome f. Hemiballism g. PMH with facial sparing h. PMH with horizontal gaze palsy i. PMH with contralateral III palsy j. PMH with contralateral VI palsy k. Cerebellar ataxia with contralateral III palsy l. Pure dysarthria 2. Absence of signs or symptoms of cortical dysfunction such as aphasia, apraxia, agnosia, agraphia, homonymous visual field defect, etc. 3. No ipsilateral cervical carotid stenosis (?50%) by a reliable imaging modality done in an approved laboratory within 6 months of the qualifying S3, if hemispheric. 4. No major-risk cardioembolic sources requiring anticoagulation or other specific therapy. Minor-risk cardioembolic sources will be permitted if anticoagulation is not prescribed by the patient?s primary care physician. Major risk sourcesa: Minor risk sourcesc: ? Atrial fibrillation ? Mitral valve prolapse + myxomatous changes ? Mitral stenosis ? Mitral annular calcification ? Prosthetic cardiac valves ? Patent foramen ovaled ? Recent (=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 50

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Scale ?4) 2. Previous intracranial hemorrhage (excluding traumatic) or hemorrhagic stroke 3. Age under 40 years 4. High risk of bleeding (e.g. recurrent GI or GU bleeding, active peptic ulcer disease, etc) 5. Anticipated requirement for long-term use of anticoagulants (e.g. recurrent DVT) or other antiplatelets 6. Prior cortical stroke (diagnosed either clinically or by neuroimaging), or prior cortical or retinal TIA 7. Prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy 8. Impaired renal function: characterized by estimated GFR < 40 9. Intolerance or contraindications to aspirin or clopidogrel (including thrombocytopenia, prolonged INR) 10. A score < 24 (adjusted for age and education; adapted from Crum et al, 1993; n = 18,056)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To determine whether combination antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin (325 mg/d, enteric coated) plus clopidogrel (75 mg/d) is superior to aspirin (325 mg/d, enteric coated) for reducing recurrent stroke (the primary endpoint), cognitive decline and major vascular events.;Secondary Objective: To determine whether ?intensive? blood pressure lowering to a specific target range is superior to ?usual? hypertension management for reducing recurrent stroke, cognitive decline and major vascular events.;Primary end point(s): First occurrence during follow-up of any stroke, including ischemic and hemorrhagic;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: length of follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: length of follow-up;Secondary end point(s): The impact of antiplatelet therapy on the rate of cognitive decline. The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference in the rate of cognitive decline among SPS3 participants assigned to receive aspirin alone vs. the combination of aspirin with clopidogrel. Analysis for the effects of therapy on cognitive function will be through assessing changes on repeated neuropsychological tests. The primary measure of cognitive function will be the Cognitive Assessment Screening Instrument.

Countries

Argentina, Ecuador, Spain, United States

Contacts

Public ContactFundación IDIBELL

IDIBELL

crosso@bellvitgehospital.cat0034932607747

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026