Skip to content

A controlled, double-blind and randomized study, to compare the immunogenicity and safety of HEXAVAC manufactured by an upgraded process to HEXAVAC manufactured by the current process when given to healthy infants at 2, 4 & 6 months of age followed by a booster dose at 12 months of age

A controlled, double-blind and randomized study, to compare the immunogenicity and safety of HEXAVAC manufactured by an upgraded process to HEXAVAC manufactured by the current process when given to healthy infants at 2, 4 & 6 months of age followed by a booster dose at 12 months of age

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2005-002578-31-SK
Enrollment
800
Registered
2005-07-13
Start date
2005-09-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The vaccine is indicated for primary and booster vaccination of children against six infectious diseases: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis caused by 3 types of poliovirus (type 1,2 and 3), and invasive infections caused by Haemophilus influenza type b.

Interventions

Sponsors

Sanofi Pasteur MSD S.N.C.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Healthy infants of either gender, 2. 2 month-old infants (aged 57 to 90 days inclusive), 3. Infant born after 36 weeks of pregnancy and with a birth weight = 2.5 kg, 4. Consent form signed by parents or by the legal representative properly informed about the study, 5. Parents / legal representative able to understand the protocol requirements and to fill in the Diary Card. Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) no F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Severe febrile illness and/or rectal temperature ³ 38.0°C at the time of vaccination, 2. Known history of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, H. influenzae type b, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B, 3. Infant known to be already immunised with one or more doses of vaccine against pertussis, tetanus, diphtheria, H. influenzae type b, poliomyelitis or hepatitis B, 4. Infant born from known HBs-Ag positive mother, 5. Known allergy to at least one of the vaccine components, 6. Known immune dysfunction (including subjects with HIV infection, sickle cell disease, asplenia, and other acquired immunodeficiency), 7. Infant who received within the previous 30 days or who will receive during the course of the study, a treatment likely to alter the immune response (any long-term (³ 14 days) administration of systemic corticosteroid therapy given daily or on alternate days at high doses [³ 2mg/kg/day prednisone equivalent or ³ 20mg/day if weight more than 10kg]), 8. Infant who received within the previous 90 days or who will receive during the course of the study immunoglobulin or blood products 9. Infant with severe chronic disease, 10. Known history of thrombocytopenia or any coagulation disorder that would contraindicate intramuscular injection, 11. BCG vaccination in the previous 30 days, 12. Infant who, in the investigator’s opinion, is likely to be lost to follow-up or to be poorly compliant with the study requirements, 13. Participation in another clinical study within 30 days before study inclusion and/or during the whole study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: 1. To show, that when HEXAVAC® upgraded process is given in a 3-dose primary series at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, followed by a booster dose at 12 months the anti-HBs seroprotection rate one month post-primary series or one month post-booster is non inferior to the rate observed in subjects who receive HEXAVAC® current process in the same schedule. 2. If objective 1 is reached post-primary series, to show, that when HEXAVAC® upgraded process or HEXAVAC® current process is given in a 3-dose primary series at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, the anti-HBs seroprotection rate one month post-primary series is acceptable compared to HEXAVAC® historical data. or If objective 1 is reached post-booster, to show, that when HEXAVAC® upgraded process or HEXAVAC® current process is given in a 3-dose primary series at 2, 4 and 6 months of age followed by a booster dose at 12 months, the anti-HBs seroprotection rate one month post-booster is acceptable compared to HEXAVAC® historical data.;Secondary Objective: Immunogenicity: 1. To show that when given in a 3-dose primary series at 2, 4 and 6 months of age followed by a booster dose at 12 months, the one month post-booster anti-HBs GMT of HEXAVAC® upgraded process is superior to the one month post-booster anti-HBs GMT of HEXAVAC® current process. 2. To describe the one month post-primary series, the pre-booster and the one month post-booster immune responses to all HEXAVAC® upgraded process and HEXAVAC® current process antigens, when HEXAVAC® upgraded process and HEXAVAC® current process are given in a 3-dose primary series at 2, 4 and 6 months of age followed by a booster dose at 12 months. Safety: 3. To describe the safety profile of HEXAVAC® upgraded process and HEXAVAC® current process when both vaccines are given in a 3-dose primary series at 2, 4 and 6 months of age followed by a booster dose at 12 months.;Primary end point(s): The primary criteria defined for immunogenicity will be the following: The 1-month post

Countries

Czech Republic, Slovakia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026