Skip to content

Large, Simple Trial Comparing Two Strategies for Management of Anti-Retroviral Therapy (The SMART Study) - SMART

Large, Simple Trial Comparing Two Strategies for Management of Anti-Retroviral Therapy (The SMART Study) - SMART

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2004-000441-38-AT
Enrollment
6000
Registered
2005-03-22
Start date
2005-04-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV infection

Interventions

Pharmaceutical Form:

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Signed informed consent 2. Evidence of HIV infection (positive ELISA and Western Blot and/or documented history of measurable HIV RNA) 3. Age > 13 years (in effect 18 years at most sites) 4. Current CD4+ cell count > 350 cells/mm3 (within 45 days prior to randomization) 5. Willing to initiate, modify, or stop antiretroviral therapy, in accordance with the randomized assignment 6. If participating in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy, willingness to use acceptable contraception methods Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Current participation in the CPCRA FIRST, MDR-HIV or another study which is not consistent with one of the treatment groups in the SMART study (e.g., ESPRIT or SILCAAT). 2. Current pregnancy or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To compare the drug conservation (DC group) strategy with the viral suppression (VS group) strategy in delaying clinical disease progression or death. ;Secondary Objective: 1. To compare the DC group with the VS group for the following: - Survival, Incidence of major cardiovascular and metabolic complications, Incidence of serious disease progression events, Combined endpoint of clinical disease progression, major cardiovascular and metabolic complications, or death, Grade 4 adverse events, Self-reported changes in body appearance, Adherence to antiretroviral treatment, averaged over follow-up, Disease progression, death, and other outcomes above within subgroups. 2.In subsamples of patients, to compare the DC and VS groups for other major disease outcome, Quality of life, HIV transmission risk behaviors, Health care utilization and costs 3. To conduct nested case-control studies in subsamples of patients on predictors of survival and clinical disease progression. 4. To study predictors of survival, disease progression, and major cardiovascular and metabolic complications. 5. Inaddition other protocol defined analyses will be conducted.;Primary end point(s): Time to disease progression or death. (The events constituting “disease progression” are opportunistic events that are consistent with the 1993 CDC expanded surveillance definition for clinical AIDS. These events are defined in the CPCRA Clinical Events Handbook and in a paper describing event documentation and review procedures. Other Major Endpoints include: -Survival -Time to major cardiovascular events: myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease requiring treatment or an invasive procedure, or stroke. (These events are defined in the CPCRA Supplemental Events Handbook.) - Time to “serious” disease progression event, including death. A serious event for this protocol is defined as one of the following: progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, lymphoma, visceral Kaposi's sarcoma, AID

Countries

Austria, Ireland, Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026