Skip to content

PsoChoice - Development of a digital tool to support an individualized, patient-centered selection of systemic therapies for psoriasis vulgaris

PsoChoice - Development of a digital tool to support an individualized, patient-centered selection of systemic therapies for psoriasis vulgaris

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00041105
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-07-24
Start date
2026-05-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

L40.9

Interventions

Group 1: Observational study: Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis vulgaris who are scheduled to start or switch to systemic therapy. At therapy initiation (routine care), demographic and clinic

Sponsors

Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Female, male, and non-binary patients > 18 years of age with moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris - Initiation or switch to systemic therapy as part of standard care - Ability and willingness to provide written consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Inability to give informed consent - Participation in another interventional study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Concordance between Algorithm Recommendations and Physicians’ Treatment Decisions Time Point: T0: Initial treatment decision made during the study visit Measurement: Comparison of the treatment option suggested by the algorithm with the treatment selected by the treating dermatologists Statistical evaluation using the Cohen’s kappa coefficient (when comparing categories)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Number and type of algorithmic treatment recommendations Time point: T0 Method: Documentation of prioritized treatment options using the scoring system 2. Identification of clinical factors relevant to decision-making Time point: T0 Method: Analysis of the parameters that lead to a change in treatment prioritization 3. Expert assessment of clinical plausibility Time point: after application to standardized patient vignettes Method: Structured assessment form (developed specifically for this study)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactChristina Pham

Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

pham.christina@mh-hannover.de+495115320

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026