Skip to content

Comparison of the newly implemented eTEP procedure versus established open Rives–Stoppa sublay repair for abdominal wall hernias: a single-centre retrospective cohort study

Comparison of the newly implemented eTEP procedure versus established open Rives–Stoppa sublay repair for abdominal wall hernias: a single-centre retrospective cohort study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00040822
Enrollment
90
Registered
2026-07-01
Start date
2026-06-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal wall hernias (primary ventral hernias and incisional hernias) treated surgically with retromuscular mesh placemnt. K43 K42

Interventions

Group 1: Single-centre, retrospective, non-interventional cohort study with two treatment arms (eTEP versus open Rives–Stoppa sublay repair). Allocation to the surgical technique occurred as part of r
no prospective formal sample-size calculation was performed.

Sponsors

Klinikum Wolfsburg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients (= 18 years) able to provide informed consent, who underwent surgical repair of a primary ventral hernia or incisional hernia with retromuscular mesh placement during the study period (elective or emergency procedures).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Mesh not placed in the retromuscular plane or direct entry into the abdominal cavity without retromuscular dissection; parastomal and lumbar hernias; procedures requiring transversus abdominis release (TAR); simultaneous repair of ventral and inguinal/femoral hernias; absence of informed consent or insufficient follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Occurrence of hernia recurrence at a minimum of six months postoperatively, defined as the reappearance of a hernia at the operated site, confirmed by clinical examination and imaging (ultrasound and/or computed tomography).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo grade = II); wound complications (infetion, seroma, haematoma); intraoperative complications; operative time; length of hospital stay; postoperative pain; hospital readmission; quality of life; reimbursement.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactIoannis Kokosis

Abteilung für Allgemeinchirurgie

Ioannis.Kokosis@klinikum.wolfsburg.de00495361803304

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026