Skip to content

cfDNA Release Following Carotid Revascularization: Comparison of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

cfDNA Release Following Carotid Revascularization: Comparison of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis - CIRCULATE-Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00040398
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-05-20
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peri-interventional neuronal injury Blood–brain barrier disruption Impaired cerebral autoregulation Cerebral hypoxia / reduced cerebral oxygenation Cognitive dysfunction / neurocognitive impairment Stroke/TIA-associated neurological deficits I65.2 G45.19 I63.-

Interventions

Group 1: Patients undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) • Potentially increased risk of microembolic events and subsequent neuronal injury. • Pre- and postoperative cfDNA assessment in combination w

Sponsors

Universitätsmedizin Mmainz
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Age = 18 years • Written informed consent for study participation • Planned carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) for high-grade asymptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis of 70–90% according to NASCET criteria • No pre-existing neurological deficits (mRS > 2) • Ability to participate in follow-up assessments • Stenosis amenable to treatment with both CEA and CAS (no anatomical preference)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Incomplete performance of the planned surgical intervention (e.g., aborted CEA or CAS procedure)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
• Determination of cfDNA concentrations in peripheral blood at predefined time points (pre-interventional, and 6, 24, and 48 hours post-intervention). • Comparison of cfDNA concentrations between the two intervention groups (CEA vs. CAS) to assess procedure-related cfDNA release. • Evaluation of temporal changes in cfDNA concentrations to characterize the dynamics of peri-interventional cfDNA release.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Correlation of cfDNA concentrations with established biomarkers of neuronal injury (S100ß, NfL, GFAP). • Comparison of the temporal release kinetics of cfDNA and conventional neuronal biomarkers during the peri-interventional course. • Correlation of cfDNA concentrations with neurological outcome, assessed using the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 24 hours post-intervention and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. • Comparison of cfDNA release patterns, including cfDNA integrity index, between the two study groups (CEA vs. CAS). • Differences in neurological outcome measures (NIHSS, mRS, MoCA, and T-MoCA) between patients undergoing CEA and CAS. • Association between pre-interventional cfDNA concentrations and the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis. • Correlation of cfDNA concentrations with cerebral autoregulation assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and arterial blood pressure monitoring (Mx = mean velocity index; TFA = transfer function analysis). • Correlation of cfDNA concentrations with regional cerebral oxygen saturation (crSpO2). • Investigation of the impact of intraoperative propofol sedation on cfDNA concentrations (subgroup analysis). • Identification of tissue-specific cfDNA fractions using methylation analyses, particularly for the detection of neuron-derived cfDNA in the context of potential intraoperative blood–brain barrier disruption. • Correlation between MRI-based morphological changes (e.g., microinfarctions, white matter alterations, perfusion deficits) and concentrations of cfDNA, NfL, GFAP, and S100ß.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactKatharina Hoeter

Universitätsmedizin Mainz

katharina.hoeter@unimedizin-mainz.de06131 177175

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026