Skip to content

Retrospective Validation of the AI System “MySympto” Using Care Data from a University Emergency Department: The KIS-ME Study

Retrospective Validation of the AI System “MySympto” Using Care Data from a University Emergency Department: The KIS-ME Study - KIS-ME Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00040333
Enrollment
8300
Registered
2026-05-12
Start date
2026-02-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The aim of the planned study is to conduct a systematic artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of an anonymised dataset using data routinely documented in the patient data management system of the Emergency Department (PDMS, COPRA), together with ICD-10 discharge diagnoses, including primary and secondary diagnoses, recorded in the hospital information system (HIS, MEDICO), and to validate a corresponding algorithm.

Interventions

Group 1: Inclusion criteria (AI geneation) The inclusion criterion is treatment as a patient in the Emergency Department of University Hospital Düsseldorf during the period from 1 January 2022 to 31 D

Sponsors

Universitätsklinkum Düsseldorf
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The inclusion criterion is treatment as a patient in the Emergency Department of University Hospital Düsseldorf during the period from 1 January 2022 to 28 February 2025. Retrospectively, all patients assigned to the non-traumatological departmental codes INNA, INER, INGI, INHO, INKP, INNR, INRH, and INSE will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Data loss, e.g. due to missing documentation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Agreement between the primary admission diagnosis proposed by the trained AI algorithm and the actual hospital discharge diagnosis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Agreement between the radiological imaging studies proposed by the algorithm — including conventional radiography and computed tomography (CT) — and the imaging studies actually performed as well as those recommended by clinical guidelines. Agreement between the laboratory parameters proposed by the AI algorithm and the laboratory parameters actually obtained as well as those recommended by clinical guidelines.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactHans-Michael Kauerz

Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf

Hans-Michael.Kauerz@med.uni-duesseldorf.de+49 211 81 07749

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026